Skip to content

Missing @Component in ReadMe example #394

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2019
Merged

Missing @Component in ReadMe example #394

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2019

Conversation

tapaderster
Copy link
Member

@tapaderster tapaderster commented Sep 28, 2019

📝 Description

Update the readme example with missing @Component annotation

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 28, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #394 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #394   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     97.62%   97.62%           
  Complexity      324      324           
=========================================
  Files           104      104           
  Lines          1223     1223           
  Branches        198      198           
=========================================
  Hits           1194     1194           
  Misses            9        9           
  Partials         20       20

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9963273...4f76af9. Read the comment docs.

@tapaderster tapaderster added the type: documentation Documentation or test changes label Sep 28, 2019
@dariuszkuc dariuszkuc merged commit 4e38e11 into master Sep 28, 2019
@dariuszkuc dariuszkuc deleted the readme branch September 28, 2019 03:28
dariuszkuc pushed a commit to dariuszkuc/graphql-kotlin that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation Documentation or test changes
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants