You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The glossary defines 'ref' as the official name of the thing,
and the output from "git grep -e '<ref' Documentation/" shows
that most everybody uses <ref>, not <reference>. In addition,
the page already says <ref> in its SYNOPSIS section for the
command when it is used in the mode to follow the reflogs.
Strictly speaking, many references of these should be updated to
<commit> after adding an explanation on how these <commit>s are
discovered (i.e. we take <rev>, <glob>, or <ref> and starting from
these commits, follow their ancestry or reflog entries to list
commits), but that would be a lot bigger change I would rather not
to do in this patch, whose primary purpose is to make the existing
documentation more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>
0 commit comments