Skip to content

fix: fixing codeql error messages #135

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2025
Merged

fix: fixing codeql error messages #135

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2025

Conversation

jkalandaibm
Copy link
Collaborator

dependency: none

PR summary

image

image

Fixes: <! -- link to issue -->

https://github.com/IBM/networking-python-sdk/security/code-scanning/tools/CodeQL/status/configurations/actions-FZTWS5DIOVRC653POJVWM3DPO5ZS6Y3PMRSXC3BNMFXGC3DZONUXGLTZNVWA/5b869ea5aa9e968c88615657bae5a6803649927a62c91a29e6e11750fcd24604

PR Checklist

Please make sure that your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows the Angular Commit Message Guidelines.
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • New tests
  • Build/CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe)

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

@jkalandaibm
fix: fixing codeql error messages
4737def 
dependency: none
Signed-off-by: jkalanda <[email protected]>
@jkalandaibm jkalandaibm merged commit a117f6f into master Mar 7, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kennburger kennburger kennburger approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jkalandaibm @kennburger