Skip to content

Fix support of Julia 1.0 #77

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2019
Merged

Conversation

devmotion
Copy link
Member

Fix #70 to support Julia 1.0 (and fix SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#974).

@devmotion
Copy link
Member Author

devmotion commented Nov 26, 2019

In principle, one should run some CI tests on Julia 1.0 if one claims to support it 😛 Should I add it to Travis?

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

@pkj-m we really need to fix that stochastic bug. I think it may be due to uninitialized undefs here: https://github.com/JuliaDiffEq/SparseDiffTools.jl/blob/master/src/coloring/acyclic_coloring.jl#L19-L20 . Maybe initalizing with zeros or something would be safer and throw a correct error.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit e0223f3 into JuliaDiff:master Nov 27, 2019
@devmotion devmotion deleted the compat branch November 27, 2019 07:34
@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Yeah... we should probably add Travis 1.0 tests. It just compiles so slow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Solving @ode_def problem fails without symbolic Jacobian Julia 1.0
2 participants