Skip to content

WIP: Faster Inference #357

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2021
Merged

WIP: Faster Inference #357

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2021

Conversation

Keno
Copy link
Contributor

@Keno Keno commented Nov 9, 2021

We need to check if this regresses quality somewhere, but if not, this
should speed up inference of LoopVectorization a fair bit.

We need to check if this regresses quality somewhere, but if not, this
should speed up inference of LoopVectorization a fair bit.
@chriselrod chriselrod enabled auto-merge (squash) November 9, 2021 23:33
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #357 (3ea59c9) into master (dd1374b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #357   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.02%   88.02%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        9427     9427           
=======================================
  Hits         8298     8298           
  Misses       1129     1129           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/codegen/lower_memory_common.jl 86.90% <100.00%> (ø)
src/codegen/lowering.jl 92.20% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 134a95c...3ea59c9. Read the comment docs.

@chriselrod chriselrod merged commit e62a7d6 into JuliaSIMD:master Nov 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants