Added missing docs for currentuser public keys #478
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Dec 4, 2016
Closed
|
Merge issue now |
acrobat
force-pushed
the
user-publickeys-docs
branch
from
bc4dcfb to
789fe80
Compare
|
@cursedcoder rebased! |
|
@cursedcoder issue #464 can be closed now |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The missing docs came to my attention in issue #467
A questions for another pr, should we rename the current user DeployKeys class (and docs files) to publickeys as this would reflect the names of github?
"Fixes" issues: #464, #467