Updated C6200

Made example more obvious that the array was heap-allocated

Author: MugBergerFries

docs/code-quality/c6200.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ ms.assetid: bbeb159b-4e97-4317-9a07-bb83cd03069a
 
 > Index '\**index*' is out of valid index range '\**min*' to '\**max*' for non-stack buffer '\**parameter-name*'
 
-This warning indicates that an integer offset into the specified array exceeds the maximum bounds of that array, potentially causing random behavior and/or crashes.
+This warning indicates that an integer offset into the specified non-stack array exceeds the maximum bounds of that array, potentially causing random behavior and/or crashes.
 
 ## Remarks
 
@@ -24,25 +24,27 @@ Code analysis name: INDEX_EXCEEDS_MAX_NONSTACK
 The following code generates this warning. This issue stems from the **`for`** loop exceeding the index range, attempting to access index 14 (the 15th element) when index 13 (the 14th element) is the last:
 
 ```cpp
-int buff[14]; // array of 0..13 elements
 void f()
 {
+    int* buff = new int[14]; // array of 0..13 elements
     for (int i = 0; i <= 14; i++) // i exceeds the index
     {
         buff[i] = 0; // warning C6200
     }
+    delete buff;
 }
 ```
 
 To correct both warnings, use correct array size as shown in the following code:
 
 ```cpp
-int buff[14]; // array of 0..13 elements
 void f()
 {
+    int* buff = new int[14]; // array of 0..13 elements
     for (int i = 0; i < 14; i++) // i == 13 on the final iteration
     {
         buff[i] = 0; // initialize buffer
     }
+    delete buff;
 }
 ```