Fix Acrolinx and grammar issues

Author: [email protected]

docs/code-quality/c26813.md

@@ -1,18 +1,16 @@
 ---
 description: "Learn more about: C26813"
 title: c26813
-keywords: c26813
-ms.date: 02/23/2022
+ms.date: 03/02/2022
 ms.topic: reference
 f1_keywords: ["C26813"]
 helpviewer_keywords: ["C26813"]
-dev_langs: ["C++"]
 ---
 # C26813
 
 > Warning C26813: Use 'bitwise and' to check if a flag is set
 
-Most `enum`s with power of two member values are intended to be used with bit flags. As a result, we rarely want to equality compare these flags. We want to extract the bits we are interested in using bitwise operations instead.
+Most `enum` types with power of two member values are intended to be used as bit flags. As a result, you rarely want to compare these flags for equality. Instead, extract the bits you're interested in by using bitwise operations.
 
 ## Example
 
@@ -41,8 +39,7 @@ void useEqualsWithBitwiseEnum(BitWise a)
 }
 ```
 
-
 ## See also
 
-[C26827](./c26827.md)
+[C26827](./c26827.md)\
 [C26828](./c26828.md)

docs/code-quality/c26827.md

@@ -1,18 +1,16 @@
 ---
 description: "Learn more about: C26827"
 title: c26827
-keywords: c26814
-ms.date: 02/23/2022
+ms.date: 03/02/2022
 ms.topic: reference
 f1_keywords: ["C26827"]
 helpviewer_keywords: ["C26827"]
-dev_langs: ["C++"]
 ---
 # C26827
 
-> Warning C26827: Did you forgot to initialize an enum or wanted to use another type? 
+> Warning C26827: Did you forget to initialize an enum, or intend to use another type?
 
-Most `enum` types used in bitwise operations are expected to have members with values of powers of two. This warning attempts to find cases where we forgot to give a value to an enum constant explicitly or inadvertently used the wrong enum type.
+Most `enum` types used in bitwise operations are expected to have members with values of powers of two. This warning attempts to find cases where a value wasn't given explicitly to an enumeration constant. It also finds cases where the wrong enumeration type may have been used inadvertently.
 
 ## Example
 
@@ -27,11 +25,11 @@ enum class AlmostBitWise
 
 int almostBitwiseEnums(AlmostBitWise a, bool cond) 
 {
-    return (int)a|(int)AlmostBitWise::A; // Warning C26827: Did you forgot to initialize an enum or wanted to use another type?
+    return (int)a|(int)AlmostBitWise::A; // Warning C26827: Did you forget to initialize an enum, or intend to use another type?
 }
 ```
 
-To fix the warning, initialize the enum constant to the correct value or use the correct enum type in the operation.
+To fix the warning, initialize the enumeration constant to the correct value, or use the correct enumeration type in the operation.
 
 ```cpp
 enum class AlmostBitWise
@@ -50,5 +48,5 @@ int almostBitwiseEnums(AlmostBitWise a, bool cond)
 
 ## See also
 
-[C26813](./c26813.md)
+[C26813](./c26813.md)\
 [C26828](./c26828.md)

docs/code-quality/c26828.md

@@ -1,18 +1,16 @@
 ---
 description: "Learn more about: C26828"
 title: c26828
-keywords: c26828
-ms.date: 02/23/2022
+ms.date: 03/02/2022
 ms.topic: reference
 f1_keywords: ["C26828"]
 helpviewer_keywords: ["C26828"]
-dev_langs: ["C++"]
 ---
 # C26828
 
 > Warning C26828: Different enum types have overlapping values. Did you want to use another enum constant here?
 
-Most of the times we use a single enum to describe all the bit flags we can use for an option. If we use two different enum types in the same bitwise expression where the enums have overlapping values the chances are good those enums were not designed to be used in the expression.
+Most of the time, a single enumeration type describes all the bit flags that you can use for an option. If you use two different enumeration types that have overlapping values in the same bitwise expression, the chances are good those enumeration types weren't designed for use together.
 
 ## Example
 
@@ -39,7 +37,7 @@ int overlappingBitwiseEnums(BitWiseA a)
 }
 ```
 
-To fix the warning make sure `enum`s that are designed to be used together have no overlapping values or make sure all the related options are in a single `enum`.
+To fix the warning. make sure enumeration types designed for use together have no overlapping values. Or, make sure all the related options are in a single enumeration type.
 
 ```cpp
 
@@ -58,6 +56,5 @@ int overlappingBitwiseEnums(BitWiseA a)
 
 ## See also
 
-[C26813](./c26813.md)
+[C26813](./c26813.md)\
 [C26827](./c26827.md)
-