Skip to content

?! what are you talking about #1093

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2019
Merged

?! what are you talking about #1093

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2019

Conversation

EmilEnchev
Copy link
Contributor

@EmilEnchev EmilEnchev commented Jun 15, 2019

For me in such way is more clear.

"Returns true if the condition is detected at each element in the indicated range or if the range is empty, and false otherwise."

Please add "or if the range is empty" at lease. Because if range is empty all_of return true too.

P.s. I'm new in GitHub. Please if I'm wrong in some my actions on that how I do things here, tell me.

This is the truth... 

"Returns **true** if the condition is detected at each element in the indicated range or if the range is empty, and **false** otherwise."

Not..

"Returns true if the condition is detected at each element in the indicated range, and false if the condition is not detected at least one time. "

"if the condition is not detected at least one time." this mean that you think if condition is detect at least one time all_of will return **true** which is not true.
@PRMerger8
Copy link
Contributor

@EmilEnchev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

@colin-home colin-home left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@EmilEnchev This is much clearer. Thanks for contributing!

@colin-home colin-home merged commit 13d1019 into MicrosoftDocs:master Jun 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants