Skip to content

Short description is wrong/misleading #1652

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 6 additions & 6 deletions docs/standard-library/is-move-constructible-class.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
---
title: "is_move_constructible Class"
ms.date: "11/04/2016"
title: "is_move_constructible class"
ms.date: "10/24/2019"
f1_keywords: ["type_traits/std::is_move_constructible"]
helpviewer_keywords: ["is_move_constructible"]
ms.assetid: becdf076-7419-488d-a335-78adf2478b9b
---
# is_move_constructible Class
# is_move_constructible class

Tests whether the type has a move constructor.
Tests whether the type can be constructed by using a move operation.

## Syntax

Expand All @@ -19,11 +19,11 @@ struct is_move_constructible;
### Parameters

*T*\
The type to be evaluated
The type to be evaluated.

## Remarks

A type predicate that evaluates to true if the type *T* can be constructed by using a move operation. This predicate is equivalent to `is_constructible<T, T&&>`.
A type predicate that evaluates to **true** if the type *T* can be constructed by using a move operation. This predicate is equivalent to `is_constructible<T, T&&>`. A type *T* that doesn't have a move constructor, but does have a copy constructor that accepts a `const T&` argument, satisfies `std::is_move_constructible`.

## Requirements

Expand Down