Skip to content

Update %Z specifier with known issue #4381

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2023
Merged

Conversation

amyw-msft
Copy link
Member

There is a known issue in the Universal C Runtime %Z specifier that it is unlikely we will be able to change for application compatibility (the issue has existed since 2015). Instead of %Z -> ANSI_STRING and %wZ -> UNICODE_STRING, the specifier acts like the %S specifier and expects the "opposite" type of string from the API used.

There is a known issue in the Universal C Runtime %Z specifier that it is unlikely we will be able to change for application compatibility (the issue has existed since 2015).  Instead of %Z -> ANSI_STRING and %wZ -> UNICODE_STRING, the specifier acts like the %S specifier and expects the "opposite" type of string from the API used.
@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Contributor

@amyw-msft : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 38231c6:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/c-runtime-library/format-specification-syntax-printf-and-wprintf-functions.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

@Jak-MS
Copy link
Contributor

Jak-MS commented Jan 23, 2023

@TylerMSFT

  • Can you review this PR?
  • IMPORTANT: When this content is ready to merge, you must add #sign-off in a comment or the approval may get overlooked.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team label Jan 23, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@TylerMSFT TylerMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#sign-off

@TylerMSFT
Copy link
Collaborator

#sign-off

@MicrosoftDocs MicrosoftDocs deleted a comment from prmerger-automator bot Jan 23, 2023
@Jak-MS Jak-MS merged commit 76183a4 into MicrosoftDocs:main Jan 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants