Skip to content

Remove superfluous backticks #5085

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

Rageking8
Copy link
Contributor

Remove superfluous backticks and some misc changes.

Copy link
Contributor

@Rageking8 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 25e30bb:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/code-quality/build-reliable-secure-programs.md ✅Succeeded
docs/code-quality/c6335.md ✅Succeeded
docs/cpp/this-pointer.md ✅Succeeded
docs/mfc/reference/cframewndex-class.md ✅Succeeded
docs/overview/cpp-conformance-improvements-2019.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@Court72
Copy link
Contributor

Court72 commented Aug 23, 2024

@TylerMSFT

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged Tracking label for the PR review team label Aug 23, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@TylerMSFT TylerMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome - thank you!

@TylerMSFT
Copy link
Collaborator

#sign-off

@Jak-MS Jak-MS merged commit 92d1bd8 into MicrosoftDocs:main Aug 23, 2024
2 checks passed
@Rageking8 Rageking8 deleted the remove-superfluous-backticks branch September 8, 2024 09:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants