Rust-for-Linux
diff --git a/‎Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst
Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion b/‎Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/net.rst
Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
diff --git a/‎Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst
Lines changed: 12 additions & 17 deletions b/‎Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst
Lines changed: 12 additions & 17 deletions
diff --git a/‎Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
Lines changed: 142 additions & 0 deletions b/‎Documentation/bpf/bpf_lsm.rst
Lines changed: 142 additions & 0 deletions
@@ -67,7 +67,8 @@ two flavors of JITs, the newer eBPF JIT currently supported on:
   - sparc64
   - mips64
   - s390x
-  - riscv
+  - riscv64
+  - riscv32
 
 And the older cBPF JIT supported on the following archs:
 
 
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ Reporting bugs
 Q: How do I report bugs for BPF kernel code?
 --------------------------------------------
 A: Since all BPF kernel development as well as bpftool and iproute2 BPF
-loader development happens through the netdev kernel mailing list,
+loader development happens through the bpf kernel mailing list,
 please report any found issues around BPF to the following mailing
 list:
 
- netdev@vger.kernel.org
+ bpf@vger.kernel.org
 
 This may also include issues related to XDP, BPF tracing, etc.
 
@@ -46,17 +46,12 @@ Submitting patches
 
 Q: To which mailing list do I need to submit my BPF patches?
 ------------------------------------------------------------
-A: Please submit your BPF patches to the netdev kernel mailing list:
+A: Please submit your BPF patches to the bpf kernel mailing list:
 
- [email protected]
-
-Historically, BPF came out of networking and has always been maintained
-by the kernel networking community. Although these days BPF touches
-many other subsystems as well, the patches are still routed mainly
-through the networking community.
+ [email protected]
 
 In case your patch has changes in various different subsystems (e.g.
-tracing, security, etc), make sure to Cc the related kernel mailing
+networking, tracing, security, etc), make sure to Cc the related kernel mailing
 lists and maintainers from there as well, so they are able to review
 the changes and provide their Acked-by's to the patches.
 
@@ -168,7 +163,7 @@ a BPF point of view.
 Be aware that this is not a final verdict that the patch will
 automatically get accepted into net or net-next trees eventually:
 
-On the netdev kernel mailing list reviews can come in at any point
+On the bpf kernel mailing list reviews can come in at any point
 in time. If discussions around a patch conclude that they cannot
 get included as-is, we will either apply a follow-up fix or drop
 them from the trees entirely. Therefore, we also reserve to rebase
@@ -494,15 +489,15 @@ A: You need cmake and gcc-c++ as build requisites for LLVM. Once you have
 that set up, proceed with building the latest LLVM and clang version
 from the git repositories::
 
-     $ git clone http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git
-     $ cd llvm/tools
-     $ git clone --depth 1 http://llvm.org/git/clang.git
-     $ cd ..; mkdir build; cd build
-     $ cmake .. -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="BPF;X86" \
+     $ git clone https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
+     $ mkdir -p llvm-project/llvm/build/install
+     $ cd llvm-project/llvm/build
+     $ cmake .. -G "Ninja" -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="BPF;X86" \
+                -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang"    \
                 -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF           \
                 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release        \
                 -DLLVM_BUILD_RUNTIME=OFF
-     $ make -j $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
+     $ ninja
 
 The built binaries can then be found in the build/bin/ directory, where
 you can point the PATH variable to.
 
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+.. Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC.
+
+================
+LSM BPF Programs
+================
+
+These BPF programs allow runtime instrumentation of the LSM hooks by privileged
+users to implement system-wide MAC (Mandatory Access Control) and Audit
+policies using eBPF.
+
+Structure
+---------
+
+The example shows an eBPF program that can be attached to the ``file_mprotect``
+LSM hook:
+
+.. c:function:: int file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot);
+
+Other LSM hooks which can be instrumented can be found in
+``include/linux/lsm_hooks.h``.
+
+eBPF programs that use :doc:`/bpf/btf` do not need to include kernel headers
+for accessing information from the attached eBPF program's context. They can
+simply declare the structures in the eBPF program and only specify the fields
+that need to be accessed.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	struct mm_struct {
+		unsigned long start_brk, brk, start_stack;
+	} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+	struct vm_area_struct {
+		unsigned long start_brk, brk, start_stack;
+		unsigned long vm_start, vm_end;
+		struct mm_struct *vm_mm;
+	} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+
+.. note:: The order of the fields is irrelevant.
+
+This can be further simplified (if one has access to the BTF information at
+build time) by generating the ``vmlinux.h`` with:
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+	# bpftool btf dump file <path-to-btf-vmlinux> format c > vmlinux.h
+
+.. note:: ``path-to-btf-vmlinux`` can be ``/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux`` if the
+	  build environment matches the environment the BPF programs are
+	  deployed in.
+
+The ``vmlinux.h`` can then simply be included in the BPF programs without
+requiring the definition of the types.
+
+The eBPF programs can be declared using the``BPF_PROG``
+macros defined in `tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h`_. In this
+example:
+
+	* ``"lsm/file_mprotect"`` indicates the LSM hook that the program must
+	  be attached to
+	* ``mprotect_audit`` is the name of the eBPF program
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	SEC("lsm/file_mprotect")
+	int BPF_PROG(mprotect_audit, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+		     unsigned long reqprot, unsigned long prot, int ret)
+	{
+		/* ret is the return value from the previous BPF program
+		 * or 0 if it's the first hook.
+		 */
+		if (ret != 0)
+			return ret;
+
+		int is_heap;
+
+		is_heap = (vma->vm_start >= vma->vm_mm->start_brk &&
+			   vma->vm_end <= vma->vm_mm->brk);
+
+		/* Return an -EPERM or write information to the perf events buffer
+		 * for auditing
+		 */
+		if (is_heap)
+			return -EPERM;
+	}
+
+The ``__attribute__((preserve_access_index))`` is a clang feature that allows
+the BPF verifier to update the offsets for the access at runtime using the
+:doc:`/bpf/btf` information. Since the BPF verifier is aware of the types, it
+also validates all the accesses made to the various types in the eBPF program.
+
+Loading
+-------
+
+eBPF programs can be loaded with the :manpage:`bpf(2)` syscall's
+``BPF_PROG_LOAD`` operation:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	struct bpf_object *obj;
+
+	obj = bpf_object__open("./my_prog.o");
+	bpf_object__load(obj);
+
+This can be simplified by using a skeleton header generated by ``bpftool``:
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+	# bpftool gen skeleton my_prog.o > my_prog.skel.h
+
+and the program can be loaded by including ``my_prog.skel.h`` and using
+the generated helper, ``my_prog__open_and_load``.
+
+Attachment to LSM Hooks
+-----------------------
+
+The LSM allows attachment of eBPF programs as LSM hooks using :manpage:`bpf(2)`
+syscall's ``BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN`` operation or more simply by
+using the libbpf helper ``bpf_program__attach_lsm``.
+
+The program can be detached from the LSM hook by *destroying* the ``link``
+link returned by ``bpf_program__attach_lsm`` using ``bpf_link__destroy``.
+
+One can also use the helpers generated in ``my_prog.skel.h`` i.e.
+``my_prog__attach`` for attachment and ``my_prog__destroy`` for cleaning up.
+
+Examples
+--------
+
+An example eBPF program can be found in
+`tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c`_ and the corresponding
+userspace code in `tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c`_
+
+.. Links
+.. _tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h:
+   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
+.. _tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c:
+   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm.c
+.. _tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c:
+   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
-Original file line number
+Diff line change
   - sparc64
   - mips64
   - s390x
 -  - riscv
 +  - riscv64
 +  - riscv32
 And the older cBPF JIT supported on the following archs: