You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We can already create `UniqueArc<MaybeUninit<T>>` instances with
`UniqueArc::try_new_uninit()` and write to them with `write()`. Add
the missing unsafe `assume_init()` function to promote it to
`UniqueArc<T>`, so users can do piece-wise initialization of the
contents instead of doing it all at once as long as they keep the
invariants (the same requirements as `MaybeUninit::assume_init()`).
This mirrors the std `Arc::assume_init()` function. In the kernel,
since we have `UniqueArc`, arguably this only belongs there since most
use cases will initialize it immediately after creating it, before
demoting it to `Arc` to share it.
[ Miguel: The "Rust pin-init API for pinned initialization of structs"
patch series [1] from Benno Lossin contains a very similar patch:
rust: sync: add `assume_init` to `UniqueArc`
Adds the `assume_init` function to `UniqueArc<MaybeUninit<T>>` that
unsafely assumes the value to be initialized and yields a value of type
`UniqueArc<T>`. This function is used when manually initializing the
pointee of an `UniqueArc`.
To make that patch a noop and thus drop it, I adjusted the `SAFETY`
comment here to be the same as in the current latest version of
that series (v7).
I have also brought the `Reviewed-by`s there into here, and reworded
the `Co-authored-by` into `Co-developed-by`. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [1]
Co-developed-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Asahi Lina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
0 commit comments