You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
net: fix sk_memory_allocated_{add|sub} vs softirqs
Jonathan Heathcote reported a regression caused by blamed commit
on aarch64 architecture.
x86 happens to have irq-safe __this_cpu_add_return()
and __this_cpu_sub(), but this is not generic.
I think my confusion came from "struct sock" argument,
because these helpers are called with a locked socket.
But the memory accounting is per-proto (and per-cpu after
the blamed commit). We might cleanup these helpers later
to directly accept a "struct proto *proto" argument.
Switch to this_cpu_add_return() and this_cpu_xchg()
operations, and get rid of preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pairs.
Fast path becomes a bit faster as a result :)
Many thanks to Jonathan Heathcote for his awesome report and
investigations.
Fixes: 3cd3399 ("net: implement per-cpu reserves for memory_allocated")
Reported-by: Jonathan Heathcote <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/VI1PR01MB42407D7947B2EA448F1E04EFD10D2@VI1PR01MB4240.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com/
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
0 commit comments