You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When registering a clock that doesn't have a recalc_rate implementation,
and doesn't have its parent registered yet, we initialize the clk_core
rate and 'req_rate' fields to 0.
The rate field is later updated when the parent is registered in
clk_core_reparent_orphans_nolock() using __clk_recalc_rates(), but the
'req_rate' field is never updated.
This leads to an issue in clk_set_rate_range() and clk_put(), since
those functions will call clk_set_rate() with the content of 'req_rate'
to provide drivers with the opportunity to change the rate based on the
new boundaries. In this case, we would call clk_set_rate() with a rate
of 0, effectively enforcing the minimum allowed for this clock whenever
we would call one of those two functions, even though the actual rate
might be within range.
Let's fix this by setting 'req_rate' in
clk_core_reparent_orphans_nolock() with the rate field content just
updated by the call to __clk_recalc_rates().
Fixes: 1c8e600 ("clk: Add rate constraints to clocks")
Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]> # T30 Nexus7
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[[email protected]: Reword comment]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>
0 commit comments