Skip to content

chore: remove unnecessary information in code_reviews #10762

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2018
Merged

chore: remove unnecessary information in code_reviews #10762

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2018

Conversation

rafaelss95
Copy link
Contributor

Since the CODEOWNERS are automatically requested for review when someone opens a PR, there's no need to mention this in docs.

@rafaelss95 rafaelss95 requested a review from jelbourn as a code owner April 8, 2018 18:45
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Apr 8, 2018
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@crisbeto crisbeto added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Apr 24, 2018
@andrewseguin andrewseguin merged commit 05207e1 into angular:master Apr 26, 2018
@rafaelss95 rafaelss95 deleted the refactor-code-reviews branch May 4, 2018 02:57
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants