Skip to content

refactor(tree): ensure input is applied to the getter and not the setter #10764

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2018
Merged

refactor(tree): ensure input is applied to the getter and not the setter #10764

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2018

Conversation

rafaelss95
Copy link
Contributor

According to CODING_STANDARDS.md#getters-and-setters:

  • Decorators such as @input should be applied to the getter and not the setter.

@rafaelss95 rafaelss95 requested a review from tinayuangao as a code owner April 8, 2018 18:50
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Apr 8, 2018
set level(value: number) {
this._level = coerceNumberProperty(value);
this._setPadding();
}
get level(): number { return this._level; }
_level: number;

/** The indent for each level. Default number 40px from material design menu sub-menu spec. */
// TODO(tinayuangao): Make indent working with a string with unit, e.g. 10em
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tinayuangao Not related to this PR, but can't this be done using coerceCssPixelValue?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

coerceCssPixelValue got in recently so it probably wasn't there when the tree was implemented.

Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@crisbeto crisbeto added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release labels Apr 9, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@tinayuangao tinayuangao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tinayuangao tinayuangao merged commit 1acda9a into angular:master Apr 11, 2018
@rafaelss95 rafaelss95 deleted the fix-tree-getters-setters branch April 12, 2018 00:42
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants