Skip to content

fix(icon): reverse for loop when removing child nodes from mat-icon #12078

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2018
Merged

fix(icon): reverse for loop when removing child nodes from mat-icon #12078

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2018

Conversation

pavel-agarkov
Copy link
Contributor

when mat-icon element has more than one child node (like when mat-badge is used) then child nodes should be removed in the reversed order otherwise you will attempt to get node by index which is not correct any more since you've deleted some nodes already in the previous iterations and it will cause an error.

when mat-icon element has more than one child node (like when mat-badge is used) then child nodes should be removed in the reversed order otherwise you will attempt to get node by index which is not correct any more since you've deleted some nodes already in the previous iterations and it will cause an error.
@pavel-agarkov pavel-agarkov requested a review from jelbourn as a code owner July 5, 2018 19:26
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jul 5, 2018
@crisbeto
Copy link
Member

crisbeto commented Jul 5, 2018

Looks like there's a compilation error now. You have to change the const childCount to a let.

@pavel-agarkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

I should never edit code in web ui again...

Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@crisbeto crisbeto added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Jul 5, 2018
@ngbot
Copy link

ngbot bot commented Jul 5, 2018

I see that you just added the pr: merge ready label, but the following checks are still failing:
    failure status "ci/circleci: build" is failing
    pending status "continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr" is pending

If you want your PR to be merged, it has to pass all the CI checks.

If you can't get the PR to a green state due to flakes or broken master, please try rebasing to master and/or restarting the CI job. If that fails and you believe that the issue is not due to your change, please contact the caretaker and ask for help.

Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn merged commit dd6aec6 into angular:master Jul 11, 2018
victoriaaa234 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2018
…12078)

When mat-icon element has more than one child node (like when mat-badge is used) then child nodes should be removed in the reversed order otherwise you will attempt to get node by index which is not correct any more since you've deleted some nodes already in the previous iterations and it will cause an error.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants