Skip to content

fix(snack-bar): dismiss snack bar on destroy #13042

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2018

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented Sep 8, 2018

Dismisses the currently-opened snack bar in ngOnDestroy.

Dismisses the currently-opened snack bar in `ngOnDestroy`.
@crisbeto crisbeto added the target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release label Sep 8, 2018
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Sep 8, 2018
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ export function MAT_SNACK_BAR_DEFAULT_OPTIONS_FACTORY(): MatSnackBarConfig {
* Service to dispatch Material Design snack bar messages.
*/
@Injectable({providedIn: MatSnackBarModule})
export class MatSnackBar {
export class MatSnackBar implements OnDestroy {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since @Injectables are just regular classes that are used as singletons, I don't believe there are any lifecycle hooks.

A quick test of checking for usage of OnInit shows that it is never called.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAIK they only have OnDestroy. I believe it gets called when the associated module is unloaded. We've been doing it for the other services as well.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh, interesting. Didn't know about that. Then this makes sense to do 👍

Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@josephperrott josephperrott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Sep 10, 2018
@jelbourn jelbourn merged commit 50be24b into angular:master Sep 14, 2018
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 9, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants