Skip to content

test: reduce reliance on static queries #20405

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2020

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

When Ivy issues were first being resolved in the repo, we accumulated a lot of static queries in tests which we generally shouldn't be depending on. These changes clean up most of the ones that don't require much refactoring to clean up. I'll make some follow-up changes for the trickier ones once these changes land.

@crisbeto crisbeto added P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent merge safe target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Aug 24, 2020
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Aug 24, 2020
@mmalerba
Copy link
Contributor

most of them look fine, but there's a failing table test

When Ivy issues were first being resolved in the repo, we accumulated a lot of static queries in tests which we generally shouldn't be depending on. These changes clean up most of the ones that don't require much refactoring to clean up. I'll make some follow-up changes for the trickier ones once these changes land.
@crisbeto crisbeto force-pushed the static-query-cleanup branch from f17acbd to 1d79537 Compare August 24, 2020 22:37
@crisbeto
Copy link
Member Author

I just reverted the table change that was causing the failure. I'll do follow-up PRs to address these trickier cases.

Copy link
Contributor

@mmalerba mmalerba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mmalerba mmalerba added the action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker label Aug 24, 2020
Copy link
Member

@devversion devversion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch 👍

@jelbourn jelbourn merged commit 169ebc4 into angular:master Aug 28, 2020
jelbourn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2020
When Ivy issues were first being resolved in the repo, we accumulated a lot of static queries in tests which we generally shouldn't be depending on. These changes clean up most of the ones that don't require much refactoring to clean up. I'll make some follow-up changes for the trickier ones once these changes land.

(cherry picked from commit 169ebc4)
annieyw pushed a commit to annieyw/components that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2020
When Ivy issues were first being resolved in the repo, we accumulated a lot of static queries in tests which we generally shouldn't be depending on. These changes clean up most of the ones that don't require much refactoring to clean up. I'll make some follow-up changes for the trickier ones once these changes land.
mmalerba pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2020
When Ivy issues were first being resolved in the repo, we accumulated a lot of static queries in tests which we generally shouldn't be depending on. These changes clean up most of the ones that don't require much refactoring to clean up. I'll make some follow-up changes for the trickier ones once these changes land.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement P3 An issue that is relevant to core functions, but does not impede progress. Important, but not urgent target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants