Fix required firmware version check

[pennam]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Memory usage change @ f56b1b9

Board	flash	%	RAM for global variables	%
arduino:mbed:envie_m7	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:mbed_nano:nanorp2040connect	🔺 +190 - +190	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:mbed_nicla:nicla_vision	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkr1000	🔺 +192 - +192	+0.07 - +0.07	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrgsm1400	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrnb1500	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwan1300	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwan1310	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwifi1010	🔺 +208 - +208	+0.08 - +0.08	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:nano_33_iot	🔺 +208 - +208	+0.08 - +0.08	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
esp32:esp32:esp32	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0
esp8266:esp8266:huzzah	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0	0 - 0	0.0 - 0.0

Click for full report table

Board	examples/ConnectionHandlerDemo flash	%	examples/ConnectionHandlerDemo RAM for global variables	%
arduino:mbed:envie_m7	0	0.0	0	0.0
arduino:mbed_nano:nanorp2040connect	190	0.0	0	0.0
arduino:mbed_nicla:nicla_vision	0	0.0	0	0.0
arduino:samd:mkr1000	192	0.07	0	0.0
arduino:samd:mkrgsm1400	0	0.0	0	0.0
arduino:samd:mkrnb1500	0	0.0	0	0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwan1300	0	0.0	0	0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwan1310	0	0.0	0	0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwifi1010	208	0.08	0	0.0
arduino:samd:nano_33_iot	208	0.08	0	0.0
esp32:esp32:esp32	0	0.0	0	0.0
esp8266:esp8266:huzzah	0	0.0	0	0.0

Click for full report CSV

Board,examples/ConnectionHandlerDemo<br>flash,%,examples/ConnectionHandlerDemo<br>RAM for global variables,%
arduino:mbed:envie_m7,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:mbed_nano:nanorp2040connect,190,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:mbed_nicla:nicla_vision,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:samd:mkr1000,192,0.07,0,0.0
arduino:samd:mkrgsm1400,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:samd:mkrnb1500,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwan1300,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwan1310,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwifi1010,208,0.08,0,0.0
arduino:samd:nano_33_iot,208,0.08,0,0.0
esp32:esp32:esp32,0,0.0,0,0.0
esp8266:esp8266:huzzah,0,0.0,0,0.0

[aentinger]

I believe it worked before too. Now it's on the safe side though =)

[pennam]

I believe it worked before too. Now it's on the safe side though =)

no, it was not working as intended. It was comparing pointers to the string not the string content itself.

[aentinger]

no, it was not working as intended. It was comparing pointers to the string not the string content itself.

Good catch than 🚀