Skip to content

chore(clients): regenerate clients with DirectedCodegen #3963

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2022

Conversation

gosar
Copy link
Contributor

@gosar gosar commented Sep 16, 2022

Based on running yarn generate-clients on top of using smithy-typescript changes in smithy-lang/smithy-typescript#585.

On 8/31 there were no diffs. On 9/15 when I rebase and regenerate, I do not expect any diff, but I'm seeing this diff, just in 1 client - identitystore. It is just moving couple of exceptions to a different location. I don't know why there is this diff and just for this one client - not sure what is special about it. Between 8/31-9/15 the only changes in smithy-typescript are rebasing and adding the EndpointV2 logic to DirectedTypeScriptCodegen (what used to be in CodegenVistor, which is deleted in favor of DirectedTypeScriptCodegen).


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@trivikr
Copy link
Member

trivikr commented Sep 16, 2022

I'm also not sure why the rearrangement is happening.
But verified that rearrangement happens in my local workspace too.

This PR looks good to me. If the situation affects more clients, we'll prioritize sorting the models.

@gosar gosar marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2022 20:06
@gosar gosar requested a review from a team as a code owner September 16, 2022 20:06
@trivikr trivikr merged commit c259df5 into aws:main Sep 16, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2022

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants