chore(clients): regenerate clients with DirectedCodegen #3963
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on running
yarn generate-clients
on top of using smithy-typescript changes in smithy-lang/smithy-typescript#585.On 8/31 there were no diffs. On 9/15 when I rebase and regenerate, I do not expect any diff, but I'm seeing this diff, just in 1 client - identitystore. It is just moving couple of exceptions to a different location. I don't know why there is this diff and just for this one client - not sure what is special about it. Between 8/31-9/15 the only changes in smithy-typescript are rebasing and adding the EndpointV2 logic to DirectedTypeScriptCodegen (what used to be in CodegenVistor, which is deleted in favor of DirectedTypeScriptCodegen).
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.