update

Author: jensmaurer

issues/2871.html

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
   Core Issues List revision 114b.
   See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official
   list.</EM></P>
-<P>2024-05-06</P>
+<P>2024-06-26</P>
 <HR>
 <A NAME="2871"></A><H4>2871.
 
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 <A HREF="https://github.com/cplusplus/CWG/issues/510">#510</A>.)</P>
 
 <P>Subclause 11.4.5.2 [<A href="https://wg21.link/class.default.ctor#1">class.default.ctor</A>] paragraph 1 does not, but
-should, consider user-declared constructor templaets.</P>
+should, consider user-declared constructor templates.</P>
 
 <P><B>Proposed resolution (approved by CWG 2024-04-05):</B></P>
 

issues/2875.html

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
   Core Issues List revision 114b.
   See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ for the official
   list.</EM></P>
-<P>2024-06-24</P>
+<P>2024-06-26</P>
 <HR>
 <A NAME="2875"></A><H4>2875.
 
@@ -56,9 +56,10 @@
 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ins">
 
 <B>Affected subclause:</B> 7.6.2.2 [<A href="https://wg21.link/expr.unary.op">expr.unary.op</A>]<BR>
-<B>Change:</B> Taking the address of a dereferenced null or past-the-end pointer value
-is well-defined in C (and yields the original pointer value),
-but results in undefined behavior in C++.
+<B>Change:</B> In certain contexts, taking the address of a
+dereferenced null or past-the-end pointer value is well-defined in C
+(and yields the original pointer value), but results in undefined
+behavior in C++.
 For example:
 <PRE>
   void f() {