[dcl.fct.def.delete], [dcl.constexpr], [class.friend]: Replace "implicitly inline" with "implicitly an inline function", because the latter is the term defined in 7.1.2.

Author: zygoloid

source/access.tex

@@ -759,8 +759,7 @@
 \exitexample
 
 \pnum
-Such a function is implicitly
-\tcode{inline}.
+Such a function is implicitly an inline function~(\ref{dcl.fct.spec}).
 A
 \tcode{friend}
 function defined in a class is in the (lexical) scope of the class in which it is defined.

source/declarations.tex

@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@
 a constructor declaration declares that constructor to be a
 \defnx{constexpr constructor}{specifier!\idxcode{constexpr}!constructor}.
 \tcode{constexpr} functions and \tcode{constexpr} constructors are
-implicitly \tcode{inline}~(\ref{dcl.fct.spec}).
+implicitly inline functions~(\ref{dcl.fct.spec}).
 
 \pnum
 \indextext{specifier!\idxcode{constexpr}!function}

source/declarators.tex

@@ -2345,7 +2345,7 @@
 \exitexample
 
 \pnum
-A deleted function is implicitly inline. \enternote The
+A deleted function is implicitly an inline function~(\ref{dcl.fct.spec}). \enternote The
 one-definition rule~(\ref{basic.def.odr}) applies to deleted definitions. \exitnote
 A deleted definition of a function shall be the first declaration of the function or,
 for an explicit specialization of a function template, the first declaration of that