Skip to content

updating keyring documentation #61

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 21, 2024
Merged

updating keyring documentation #61

merged 13 commits into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

SathishKumarHS
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SathishKumarHS SathishKumarHS changed the title added introduction updating keyring documentation Jun 11, 2024
@SathishKumarHS SathishKumarHS marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2024 13:05
@SathishKumarHS SathishKumarHS requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2024 13:05

4. **Access tokens:** Upon successful authorization, the service provides your snap-in with an access token. This token is used to access user data on the service's behalf without requiring the user's password again.

5. **Refreshing tokens:** A key benefit of using keyrings for OAuth is that they can handle refreshing access tokens automatically. Most OAuth implementations issue a refresh token alongside the access token. This refresh token can be used to obtain a new access token before the current one expires. If the token is not provided or is expired, the user will need to re-authorize the connection.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SathishKumarHS please verify that the revision I made is correct.

@bc-devrev bc-devrev requested a review from petermari June 20, 2024 17:09
Copy link

@petermari petermari left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

@SathishKumarHS SathishKumarHS merged commit 8b5b2a7 into main Jun 21, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@SathishKumarHS SathishKumarHS deleted the ISS-99778 branch June 21, 2024 20:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants