fix(replay): Make maskAllText selector more specific
#6544
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
size-limit report 📦
|
mydea
force-pushed
the
fn/replay-maskAllText
branch
from
96f007e to
59ec877
Compare
Sometimes, we seemed to be masking e.g. content of style tags. This new selector should be more specific to not mask anything that we know is not actually text.
mydea
force-pushed
the
fn/replay-maskAllText
branch
from
59ec877 to
7dd52bd
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sometimes, we seemed to be masking e.g. content of style tags. This new selector should be more specific to not mask anything that we know is not actually text.