add ignore_missing_links mode to revwalk

When pack-objects is computing the reachability bitmap to
serve a fetch request, it can erroneously die() if some of
the UNINTERESTING objects are not present. Upload-pack
throws away HAVE lines from the client for objects we do not
have, but we may have a tip object without all of its
ancestors (e.g., if the tip is no longer reachable and was
new enough to survive a `git prune`, but some of its
reachable objects did get pruned).

In the non-bitmap case, we do a revision walk with the HAVE
objects marked as UNINTERESTING. The revision walker
explicitly ignores errors in accessing UNINTERESTING commits
to handle this case (and we do not bother looking at
UNINTERESTING trees or blobs at all).

When we have bitmaps, however, the process is quite
different.  The bitmap index for a pack-objects run is
calculated in two separate steps:

First, we perform an extensive walk from all the HAVEs to
find the full set of objects reachable from them. This walk
is usually optimized away because we are expected to hit an
object with a bitmap during the traversal, which allows us
to terminate early.

Secondly, we perform an extensive walk from all the WANTs,
which usually also terminates early because we hit a commit
with an existing bitmap.

Once we have the resulting bitmaps from the two walks, we
AND-NOT them together to obtain the resulting set of objects
we need to pack.

When we are walking the HAVE objects, the revision walker
does not know that we are walking it only to mark the
results as uninteresting. We strip out the UNINTERESTING flag,
because those objects _are_ interesting to us during the
first walk. We want to keep going to get a complete set of
reachable objects if we can.

We need some way to tell the revision walker that it's OK to
silently truncate the HAVE walk, just like it does for the
UNINTERESTING case. This patch introduces a new
`ignore_missing_links` flag to the `rev_info` struct, which
we set only for the HAVE walk.

It also adds tests to cover UNINTERESTING objects missing
from several positions: a missing blob, a missing tree, and
a missing parent commit. The missing blob already worked (as
we do not care about its contents at all), but the other two
cases caused us to die().

Note that there are a few cases we do not need to test:

  1. We do not need to test a missing tree, with the blob
     still present. Without the tree that refers to it, we
     would not know that the blob is relevant to our walk.

  2. We do not need to test a tip commit that is missing.
     Upload-pack omits these for us (and in fact, we
     complain even in the non-bitmap case if it fails to do
     so).

Reported-by: Siddharth Agarwal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vicent Marti <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>

Author: vmg

list-objects.c

@@ -81,8 +81,11 @@ static void process_tree(struct rev_info *revs,
 		die("bad tree object");
 	if (obj->flags & (UNINTERESTING | SEEN))
 		return;
-	if (parse_tree(tree) < 0)
+	if (parse_tree(tree) < 0) {
+		if (revs->ignore_missing_links)
+			return;
 		die("bad tree object %s", sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
+	}
 	obj->flags |= SEEN;
 	show(obj, path, name, cb_data);
 	me.up = path;

pack-bitmap.c

@@ -727,8 +727,10 @@ int prepare_bitmap_walk(struct rev_info *revs)
 	revs->pending.objects = NULL;
 
 	if (haves) {
+		revs->ignore_missing_links = 1;
 		haves_bitmap = find_objects(revs, haves, NULL);
 		reset_revision_walk();
+		revs->ignore_missing_links = 0;
 
 		if (haves_bitmap == NULL)
 			die("BUG: failed to perform bitmap walk");

revision.c

@@ -2866,9 +2866,11 @@ static struct commit *get_revision_1(struct rev_info *revs)
 			if (revs->max_age != -1 &&
 			    (commit->date < revs->max_age))
 				continue;
-			if (add_parents_to_list(revs, commit, &revs->commits, NULL) < 0)
-				die("Failed to traverse parents of commit %s",
-				    sha1_to_hex(commit->object.sha1));
+			if (add_parents_to_list(revs, commit, &revs->commits, NULL) < 0) {
+				if (!revs->ignore_missing_links)
+					die("Failed to traverse parents of commit %s",
+						sha1_to_hex(commit->object.sha1));
+			}
 		}
 
 		switch (simplify_commit(revs, commit)) {

revision.h

@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ struct rev_info {
 	enum rev_sort_order sort_order;
 
 	unsigned int	early_output:1,
-			ignore_missing:1;
+			ignore_missing:1,
+			ignore_missing_links:1;
 
 	/* Traversal flags */
 	unsigned int	dense:1,

t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh

@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
 test_description='exercise basic bitmap functionality'
 . ./test-lib.sh
 
+objpath () {
+	echo ".git/objects/$(echo "$1" | sed -e 's|\(..\)|\1/|')"
+}
+
 test_expect_success 'setup repo with moderate-sized history' '
 	for i in $(test_seq 1 10); do
 		test_commit $i
@@ -115,6 +119,33 @@ test_expect_success 'fetch (full bitmap)' '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'create objects for missing-HAVE tests' '
+	blob=$(echo "missing have" | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
+	tree=$(printf "100644 blob $blob\tfile\n" | git mktree) &&
+	parent=$(echo parent | git commit-tree $tree) &&
+	commit=$(echo commit | git commit-tree $tree -p $parent) &&
+	cat >revs <<-EOF
+	HEAD
+	^HEAD^
+	^$commit
+	EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'pack with missing blob' '
+	rm $(objpath $blob) &&
+	git pack-objects --stdout --revs <revs >/dev/null
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'pack with missing tree' '
+	rm $(objpath $tree) &&
+	git pack-objects --stdout --revs <revs >/dev/null
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'pack with missing parent' '
+	rm $(objpath $parent) &&
+	git pack-objects --stdout --revs <revs >/dev/null
+'
+
 test_lazy_prereq JGIT '
 	type jgit
 '