rev-parse: don't trim bisect refnames

Using for_each_ref_in() with a full refname has always been
a questionable practice, but it became an error with
b9c8e7f (prefix_ref_iterator: don't trim too much,
2017-05-22), making "git rev-parse --bisect" pretty reliably
show a BUG.

Commit 03df567 (for_each_bisect_ref(): don't trim
refnames, 2017-06-18) fixed this case for revision.c, but
rev-parse handles this option on its own. We can use the
same solution here (and piggy-back on its test).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Haggerty <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]>

Author: peff

builtin/rev-parse.c

@@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ int cmd_rev_parse(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 				continue;
 			}
 			if (!strcmp(arg, "--bisect")) {
-				for_each_ref_in("refs/bisect/bad", show_reference, NULL);
-				for_each_ref_in("refs/bisect/good", anti_reference, NULL);
+				for_each_fullref_in("refs/bisect/bad", show_reference, NULL, 0);
+				for_each_fullref_in("refs/bisect/good", anti_reference, NULL, 0);
 				continue;
 			}
 			if (opt_with_value(arg, "--branches", &arg)) {

t/t6002-rev-list-bisect.sh

@@ -236,17 +236,31 @@ test_sequence "--bisect"
 #
 #
 
-test_expect_success '--bisect can default to good/bad refs' '
+test_expect_success 'set up fake --bisect refs' '
 	git update-ref refs/bisect/bad c3 &&
 	good=$(git rev-parse b1) &&
 	git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good &&
 	good=$(git rev-parse c1) &&
-	git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good &&
+	git update-ref refs/bisect/good-$good $good
+'
 
+test_expect_success 'rev-list --bisect can default to good/bad refs' '
 	# the only thing between c3 and c1 is c2
 	git rev-parse c2 >expect &&
 	git rev-list --bisect >actual &&
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'rev-parse --bisect can default to good/bad refs' '
+	git rev-parse c3 ^b1 ^c1 >expect &&
+	git rev-parse --bisect >actual &&
+
+	# output order depends on the refnames, which in turn depends on
+	# the exact sha1s. We just want to make sure we have the same set
+	# of lines in any order.
+	sort <expect >expect.sorted &&
+	sort <actual >actual.sorted &&
+	test_cmp expect.sorted actual.sorted
+'
+
 test_done