You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This change takes the "uniform" full-name hash and the "locality-preserving"
name hash and combines them into a single 64-bit name hash. This increases
the memory load of the packing process (by four bytes per object).
By sorting by name-hash and then full-name-hash, this should put objects
with same name-hash close, but broken down within that via the
full-name-hash. However, this is not demonstrating significant differences
in the size of the pack-files.
Test HEAD~1 HEAD
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5313.2: thin pack 0.08(0.06+0.01) 0.08(0.06+0.01) +0.0%
5313.3: thin pack size 852.7K 852.7K +0.0%
5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.01+0.01) 0.03(0.01+0.01) +0.0%
5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 401.9K 401.9K +0.0%
5313.6: big pack 1.02(1.87+0.14) 1.11(1.91+0.20) +8.8%
5313.7: big pack size 58.5M 58.5M -0.0%
5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 0.91(1.46+0.12) 1.00(1.52+0.16) +9.9%
5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 58.0M 58.0M +0.0%
5313.10: repack 104.65(391.84+12.31) 105.51(383.09+14.05) +0.8%
5313.11: repack size 438.6M 438.4M -0.1%
5313.12: repack with --full-name-hash 22.71(74.94+6.08) 22.91(74.73+6.16) +0.9%
5313.13: repack size with --full-name-hash 167.6M 168.3M +0.4%
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
0 commit comments