Skip to content

Actions: github/codeql-coding-standards

Actions

🏁 Run Release Performance Check

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Show workflow options

Create status badge

Loading
dispatch-release-performance-check.yml
236 workflow runs
236 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

PRE32-C : Does not detect presence of preprocessor directives in function calls correctly 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1897: Issue comment #654 (comment) created by lcartey
July 30, 2024 14:30 12s
July 30, 2024 14:30 12s
PRE32-C : Does not detect presence of preprocessor directives in function calls correctly 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1896: Issue comment #654 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 30, 2024 05:30 13s
July 30, 2024 05:30 13s
M0-1-10: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called" 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1895: Issue comment #646 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 28, 2024 23:54 13s
July 28, 2024 23:54 13s
Bump gitpython from 3.1.37 to 3.1.41 in /scripts/release 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1894: Issue comment #484 (comment) created by dependabot bot
July 26, 2024 11:48 14s
July 26, 2024 11:48 14s
Bump gitpython from 3.1.37 to 3.1.41 in /scripts/release 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1893: Issue comment #484 (comment) created by lcartey
July 26, 2024 11:48 10s
July 26, 2024 11:48 10s
Use the PR sha for the correct file artifacts 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1892: Issue comment #477 (comment) created by lcartey
July 26, 2024 11:45 10s
July 26, 2024 11:45 10s
PRE32-C: Raises false positives when a file has a function call and a preprocessor directive at any location. 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1891: Issue comment #650 (comment) created by lcartey
July 26, 2024 10:23 10s
July 26, 2024 10:23 10s
PRE32-C: Raises false positives when a file has a function call and a preprocessor directive at any location. 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1890: Issue comment #650 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 26, 2024 02:22 16s
July 26, 2024 02:22 16s
M0-1-10: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called" 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1889: Issue comment #646 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 23, 2024 03:57 12s
July 23, 2024 03:57 12s
M0-1-10: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called" 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1888: Issue comment #646 (comment) created by lcartey
July 22, 2024 11:12 12s
July 22, 2024 11:12 12s
M0-1-10: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called" 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1887: Issue comment #646 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 22, 2024 01:18 16s
July 22, 2024 01:18 16s
A8-5-2: Reports a violation even for correctly initialized variables as per the rule 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1886: Issue comment #645 (comment) created by lcartey
July 19, 2024 21:56 14s
July 19, 2024 21:56 14s
M0-1-10: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called" 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1885: Issue comment #646 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 19, 2024 02:56 14s
July 19, 2024 02:56 14s
M0-1-10: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called" 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1884: Issue comment #646 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 19, 2024 02:01 13s
July 19, 2024 02:01 13s
M0-1-10: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called" 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1883: Issue comment #646 (comment) created by lcartey
July 19, 2024 00:06 15s
July 19, 2024 00:06 15s
M0-1-10: Functions called from int32_t main() are not considered as "called" 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1882: Issue comment #646 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 18, 2024 06:27 20s
July 18, 2024 06:27 20s
A8-5-2: Reports a violation even for correctly initialized variables as per the rule 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1881: Issue comment #645 (comment) created by rak3-sh
July 18, 2024 01:25 21s
July 18, 2024 01:25 21s
A8-5-2: Reports a violation even for correctly initialized variables as per the rule 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1880: Issue comment #645 (comment) created by lcartey
July 17, 2024 14:00 12s
July 17, 2024 14:00 12s
A2-7-3: Exclude Doxygen comment groups from results 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1879: Issue comment #640 (comment) created by nicolaswill
July 13, 2024 14:24 23s
July 13, 2024 14:24 23s
A2-7-3: Exclude Doxygen comment groups from results 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1878: Issue comment #640 (comment) created by nicolaswill
July 13, 2024 13:38 12s
July 13, 2024 13:38 12s
A13-3-1: Ignore false overloads with the same parameter type 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1877: Issue comment #406 (comment) created by knewbury01
July 12, 2024 03:34 15s
July 12, 2024 03:34 15s
A7-1-7: Exclude anonymous structs 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1876: Issue comment #630 (comment) created by knewbury01
July 4, 2024 21:50 15s
July 4, 2024 21:50 15s
🏁 Run Release Performance Check 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1875: created by WINNING999
July 3, 2024 05:19 15s
July 3, 2024 05:19 15s
🏁 Run Release Performance Check 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1874: created by WINNING999
July 3, 2024 05:14 12s
July 3, 2024 05:14 12s
A3-9-1: Ignore use of int in operator increment/decrement 🏁 Run Release Performance Check #1873: Issue comment #614 (comment) created by jokerputihboy
June 27, 2024 18:05 18s
June 27, 2024 18:05 18s