|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +about_title: en (English) Nominations for the Haskell Foundation Board of Directors |
| 3 | +about_content: |
| 4 | + about_page_title: Haskell Foundation Board Call for Nominations |
| 5 | + about_page_content: | |
| 6 | +
|
| 7 | + The Haskell Foundation seeks nominations for the Foundation Board. |
| 8 | +
|
| 9 | + The Haskell Foundation is a new non-profit organisation that seeks |
| 10 | + to articulate the benefits of functional programming to a broader |
| 11 | + audience, to erase barriers to entry, and to support Haskell as a |
| 12 | + solidly reliable basis for mission-critical applications. |
| 13 | +
|
| 14 | + ### The Foundation Board |
| 15 | +
|
| 16 | + #### Remit of the Board |
| 17 | +
|
| 18 | + The Board provides the strategic leadership for the Foundation. More specifically |
| 19 | +
|
| 20 | + * Governance: leadership and direction - set strategy, provide guidance |
| 21 | + * Staff: appoint senior members of Foundation staff |
| 22 | + * Define, curate and track Foundation goals |
| 23 | + * Seek out opportunities to further the goals of the Foundation |
| 24 | + * Represent the Haskell community to the world: liaise with sponsors, public bodies (ACM, standards committees) etc |
| 25 | + * Ensure success and long-term continuity of the Foundation |
| 26 | + * Receive and review financial accounts |
| 27 | +
|
| 28 | + #### Membership |
| 29 | +
|
| 30 | + * Being a member of the Board is not an honorary post; it involves real work. There will typically be ad-hoc or permanent working groups, on which Board members are expected to serve or chair. |
| 31 | + * The Board needs to be big enough to have a breadth of expertise and representation, but small enough to be effective. We will start with a Board of 12 members. |
| 32 | + * Once appointed, board members should act in the best interests of the Foundation and the entire Haskell community; they are not appointed to represent the interests of a particular group. |
| 33 | + * Members will have fixed terms, to ensure a steady turnover of members. There is a balance here: it’s a pity to lose strong, well-qualified members too quickly. The details remain to be settled, but will be something like: three or four year terms, but with the possibility of being renewed once, and the possibility of returning after a gap. |
| 34 | + * Terms will be staggered so that a similar number of members reach the end of their term at regular intervals. “Regular intervals” might mean annually or every two years; again there is a balance between providing a regular “way in” and the overheads of nomination, selection, and onboarding.To bootstrap this process the Interim Board may invite some members to serve for shorter initial terms. |
| 35 | + * No two members should be paid employees of the same organisation |
| 36 | +
|
| 37 | + The Executive Director reports to the board, attends all board |
| 38 | + meetings, but does not vote. |
| 39 | +
|
| 40 | + The initial membership of the Board will be chosen by the Interim |
| 41 | + Board, based on open nominations against written criteria. (After |
| 42 | + this bootstrap process, the Board itself chooses its new members, |
| 43 | + based on a similar call for nominations.) This document is the call |
| 44 | + for nominations. |
| 45 | +
|
| 46 | + #### Key Roles |
| 47 | +
|
| 48 | + * Chair (elected annually by the Foundation Board members) |
| 49 | + * Treasurer |
| 50 | + * Secretary |
| 51 | +
|
| 52 | + #### Transparency |
| 53 | + The Board should conduct its business as transparently as |
| 54 | + possible. Specifically: |
| 55 | +
|
| 56 | + * It should publish public minutes of meetings and decisions. |
| 57 | + * It should be open about its finances: where money comes from, and what it is spent on. |
| 58 | + * It should conduct most conversations on a publicly-readable mailing list. |
| 59 | +
|
| 60 | + In all cases there may be some aspects of the Board’s work that should |
| 61 | + properly be private, e.g. relating to security, staff, or money. The |
| 62 | + Board will have to make judgements about this, but the strong default |
| 63 | + is to work in public. |
| 64 | +
|
| 65 | + ### Nominations for the Board |
| 66 | +
|
| 67 | + Please submit your nomination to [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]), |
| 68 | + by **Monday 11 January 2021**. |
| 69 | +
|
| 70 | + Your nomination should be accompanied by a brief CV and a covering |
| 71 | + letter that says |
| 72 | +
|
| 73 | + * How you fit the criteria below. |
| 74 | + * Why you would like to be a Board member |
| 75 | + * What you feel you could contribute |
| 76 | +
|
| 77 | + Please indicate whether you would consider the role of Secretary |
| 78 | + (legal knowledge/experience useful) or Treasurer (financial |
| 79 | + knowledge/experience useful). |
| 80 | +
|
| 81 | + These nominations will be evaluated by the [Interim |
| 82 | + Board](/who-we-are), which will disband once the Foundation Board |
| 83 | + is in place. Its members are: |
| 84 | +
|
| 85 | + * Lennart Augustsson (Epic Games) |
| 86 | + * Chris Dornan (IRIS Connect) |
| 87 | + * Jasper van der Jeugt (haskell.org) |
| 88 | + * Gabriele Keller (Utrecht University) |
| 89 | + * Ed Kmett (Miri) |
| 90 | + * Simon Marlow (Facebook) |
| 91 | + * Simon Peyton Jones (Microsoft Research) |
| 92 | + * Stephanie Weirich (University of Pennsylvania) |
| 93 | +
|
| 94 | + ### Criteria |
| 95 | +
|
| 96 | + Nominations for membership of the Board will be evaluated against |
| 97 | + the following criteria: |
| 98 | +
|
| 99 | + * You have a positive drive and vision for the Haskell community and ecosystem |
| 100 | + * You have a track record of contribution to the Haskell community and ecosystem |
| 101 | + * You are widely trusted and respected in the community. |
| 102 | + * You have enough time and energy to devote to being a member of the board; it is not an honorary position! |
| 103 | +
|
| 104 | + The Interim Board will seek to appoint a Board that, collectively, |
| 105 | + satisfies these criteria: |
| 106 | +
|
| 107 | + * Includes individuals with the skills, expertise and experience (e.g. technical, legal, organisational, community-building) that the Board needs. |
| 108 | + * Reflects the rich diversity (e.g. of age, gender, geographical spread) that is in the Haskell community. |
| 109 | + * Includes individuals who are well-equipped to reflect the priorities of Haskell’s various constituencies, including |
| 110 | + - Companies that use Haskell in production, and Haskell consultancies; giving this group a stronger voice is one of the HF’s main goals. |
| 111 | + - Users of Haskell. That might include companies, but also includes the broader open-source community, hobbyists, etc. |
| 112 | + - Sponsors: companies (or even individuals) who are funding the Foundation. |
| 113 | + - People who build and run the infrastructure of the Haskell ecosystem: compilers, libraries, packaging and distribution, IDEs etc. |
| 114 | + - Educators, including school, university, and commercial training courses. |
| 115 | + - Functional programming researchers who build on and/or develop Haskell. |
| 116 | +
|
| 117 | + NB: nominations are also welcome from individuals who meet other |
| 118 | + criteria but do not represent any particular constituency. |
| 119 | +
|
| 120 | + Simultaneously hitting all these criteria is nigh impossible. |
| 121 | + However, each subsequent round of nominations for new Board |
| 122 | + members offers a fresh chance to rectify any imbalances. |
| 123 | +
|
| 124 | +
|
| 125 | +--- |
0 commit comments