Skip to content

Commit 753f225

Browse files
authored
Update README.md
1 parent bb9b02d commit 753f225

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ I still need to validate the `is` and `as` implementations with more cases (I'm
222222

223223
Finally, let me show you a diagram I made in 2016. A few words have changed, and some of the topics aren't mentioned (e.g, `<=>` was added after this), but it has remained amazingly stable and is still recognizably a roadmap of Cpp2's design approach today.
224224

225-
I think this diagram is important because it attempts to write down how design decisions lead to each other and support each other... Cpp2 is not a gaggle of unrelated fixes, it is an attempt to do a coordinated refactoring of C++ so that it is still C++ but, "simplified through generalization" into a smaller number of regular and combinable features, so we can remove special cases and duplications and confusions. That's almost a direct quote of how Bjarne Stroustrup put in the _ACM History of Programming Languages III_ (and other places)... the exact quote is:
225+
I think this diagram is important because it attempts to write down how design decisions lead to each other and support each other... Cpp2 is not a gaggle of unrelated fixes, it is an attempt to do a coordinated refactoring of C++ so that it is still C++ but, "simplified through generalization" into a smaller number of regular and combinable features, so we can remove special cases and duplications and confusions. That's almost a direct quote of how Bjarne Stroustrup stated it in the _ACM History of Programming Languages III_ (among other places):
226226

227227
> "**10% the size of C++** in definition and similar in front-end compiler size. ... **Most of the simplification would come from generalization.**" (B. Stroustrup, ACM HOPL-III, 2007; emphasis added)
228228

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)