Skip to content

Add recurrentgemma and gemma.cpp as libraries #748

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

osanseviero
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@Vaibhavs10 Vaibhavs10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, confirmed by looking through all the repos here: https://huggingface.co/models?other=gemma.cpp

They all only seem to have *.sbs file format.

Copy link
Member

@pcuenca pcuenca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@julien-c julien-c left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice – should they have icons in the internal codebase?

Copy link
Contributor

@Wauplin Wauplin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

About icons, couldn't we make the process public -same as the library definitions-? Suggesting it since we have quite a lot of those, especially now that we are adding local apps as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@Wauplin Wauplin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

About icons, couldn't we make the process public -same as the library definitions-? Suggesting it since we have quite a lot of those, especially now that we are adding local apps as well.

@osanseviero osanseviero merged commit 774c609 into main Jun 10, 2024
4 checks passed
@osanseviero osanseviero deleted the osanseviero-patch-1 branch June 10, 2024 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants