Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 28, 2023. It is now read-only.

[SYCL][CUDA] Add experimental cuda queue interop test #1054

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2022

Conversation

AidanBeltonS
Copy link

@AidanBeltonS AidanBeltonS commented Jun 10, 2022

This PR add testing of the CUDA backend experimental queue interop.

It checks that valid types are returned and that the created SYCL objects can be used to do work.
It additionally creates a queue from an already existing sycl queue's native handle and makes sure it and the original work.

Depends on: intel/llvm#6290

@steffenlarsen
Copy link

/verify with intel/llvm#6290

pvchupin pushed a commit to intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2022
This PR is adds part of the CUDA-backend spec interop proposed in KhronosGroup/SYCL-Docs#197. The changes work with the CUDA CTS interop checks KhronosGroup/SYCL-CTS#336.

This PR just adds the queue interop.

llvm-test-suite: intel/llvm-test-suite#1054
@pvchupin pvchupin merged commit 3236832 into intel:intel Jun 15, 2022
myler pushed a commit to myler/llvm-test-suite that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2023
This PR add testing of the CUDA backend experimental queue interop.

It checks that valid types are returned and that the created SYCL objects can be used to do work.
It additionally creates a queue from an already existing sycl queue's native handle and makes sure it and the original work.

Depends on: intel/llvm#6290
aelovikov-intel pushed a commit to aelovikov-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
…t-suite#1054)

This PR add testing of the CUDA backend experimental queue interop.

It checks that valid types are returned and that the created SYCL objects can be used to do work.
It additionally creates a queue from an already existing sycl queue's native handle and makes sure it and the original work.

Depends on: intel#6290
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants