|
| 1 | +1 Devices discovery |
| 2 | +1.1 Root-devices |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | + Intel GPUs are represented as SYCL GPU devices, root-devices. |
| 5 | + The discovery of root-devices is best with "sycl-ls" tool, for example: |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | + $ sycl-ls |
| 8 | + [opencl:0] GPU : Intel(R) OpenCL HD Graphics 3.0 [21.19.19792] |
| 9 | + [opencl:0] CPU : Intel(R) OpenCL 2.1 [2020.11.11.0.03_160000] |
| 10 | + [level_zero:0] GPU : Intel(R) Level-Zero 1.1 [1.1.19792] |
| 11 | + [host:0] HOST: SYCL host platform 1.2 [1.2] |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | + Note that "sycl-ls" shows all devices from all platforms of all SYCL backends that are seen by SYCL runtime. |
| 14 | + So in the example above there is CPU (managed by OpenCL backend) and 2! GPUs corresponding to the single physical GPU (managed by either OpenCL or Level-Zero backend). |
| 15 | + There are few ways to filter observable root-devices. |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | + One is using environment variable SYCL_DEVICE_FILTER described in https://github.com/intel/llvm/blob/sycl/sycl/doc/EnvironmentVariables.md |
| 18 | + $ SYCL_DEVICE_FILTER=level_zero sycl-ls |
| 19 | + [level_zero:0] GPU : Intel(R) Level-Zero 1.1 [1.1.19792] |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | + Another way is to use similar SYCL API described here https://github.com/intel/llvm/blob/sycl/sycl/doc/extensions/FilterSelector/FilterSelector.adoc |
| 22 | + E.g. filter_selector("level_zero") will only see Level-Zero operated devices. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | + If there are multiple GPUs in a system then they will be seen as multiple different root-devices. |
| 25 | + On Linux these would be multiple SYCL root-devices of the same SYCL platform (representing Level-Zero driver). |
| 26 | + On Windows these would appear as root-devices of multiple different SYCL platforms (Level-Zero drivers). |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + CreateMultipleRootDevices=N can be used to emulate multiple GPU cards. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +1.2 Sub-devices |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + Some Intel GPU HW is composed of multiple tiles, e.g. 4 tile ATS. |
| 33 | + The root-device in such cases can be partitioned to sub-devices, each corresponding to the physical tiles. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | + try { |
| 36 | + vector<device> SubDevices = RootDevice.create_sub_devices< |
| 37 | + cl::sycl::info::partition_property::partition_by_affinity_domain>( |
| 38 | + cl::sycl::info::partition_affinity_domain::next_partitionable); |
| 39 | + } |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | + Each call to "create_sub_devices" will return exactly the same sub-devices and in the persistent order. |
| 42 | + To control what sub-devices are exposed by Level-Zero UMD one can use ZE_AFFINITY_MASK environment variable. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | + NOTE: The "partition_by_affinity_domain" is the only partitioning supported for Intel GPU |
| 45 | + Similar "next_partitionable" and "numa" are the only partitioning properties supported (both doing the same thing). |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | + CreateMultipleSubDevices=N can be used to emulate multiple tiles of a GPU. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +2 Context |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | + Contexts are used for resources isolation and sharing. A SYCL context may consist of one or multiple devices. |
| 52 | + Both root-devices and sub-devices can be within single context, but they all should be of the same SYCL platform. |
| 53 | + A SYCL program (kernel_bundle) created against a context with multiple devices will be built to each of the root-devices in the context. |
| 54 | + For context that consists of multiple sub-devices of the same root-device only single build (to that root-device) is needed. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +3 Memory |
| 57 | +3.1 USM |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | + There are multiple ways to allocate memory: |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | + malloc_device: Allocation can only be accessed by the specified device but not by other devices in the context nor by host. |
| 62 | + The data stays on the device all the time and thus is the fastest available for kernel execution. |
| 63 | + Explicit copy is needed for transfer data to the host or other devices in the context. |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | + malloc_host: Allocation can be accessed by the host and any other device in the context. |
| 66 | + The data stays on the host all the time and is accessed via PCI from the devices. |
| 67 | + No explicit copy is needed for synchronizing of the data with the host or devices. |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | + malloc_shared: Allocation can be accessed by the host and the specified device only. |
| 70 | + The data can migrate (operated by the Level-Zero driver) between the host and the device for faster access. |
| 71 | + No explicit copy is necessary for synchronizing between the host and the device, but it is needed for other devices in the context. |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | + NOTE: Memory allocated against a root-device is accessible by all of its sub-devices (tiles). |
| 74 | + So if operating on a context with multiple sub-devices of the same root-device then you can use "malloc_device" on that root-device instead of using the slower "malloc_host". |
| 75 | + Remember that if using "malloc_device" you'd need an explicit copy out to the host if it necessary to see data there. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +3.2 Buffer |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | + SYCL buffers are also created against a context and under the hood are mapped to the Level-Zero USM allocation discussed above. |
| 80 | + The current mapping is following: |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + -) For integrated device the allocations are made on host, and are accessible by the host and the device without any copying. |
| 83 | + -) Memory buffers for context with sub-devices of the same root-device (possibly including the root-device itself) are allocated on that root-device. |
| 84 | + Thus they are readily accessible by all the devices in such context. The synchronization with the host is performed by SYCL RT with map/unmap doing implicit copies when necessary. |
| 85 | + -) Memory buffers for context with devices from different root-devices in it are allocated on host (thus made accessible to all devices). |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +4 Queue |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | + SYCL queue is always attached to a single device in a possibly multi-device context. |
| 90 | + Some typical scenarios are the following (from most performant to least performant): |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | + A. Context with a single sub-device in it and the queue is attached to that sub-device (tile) |
| 93 | + - The execution/visibility is limited to the single sub-device only |
| 94 | + - Expected to offer the best performance per tile |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | + B. Context with multiple sub-devices of the same root-device (multi-tile) |
| 97 | + - Queues are to be attached to the sub-devices effectively implementing "explicit scaling" |
| 98 | + - The root-device should not be passed to such context for better performance |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | + C. Context with a single root-device in it and the queue is attached to that root-device |
| 101 | + - The work will be automatically distributed across all sub-devices/tiles via "implicit scaling" by the driver |
| 102 | + - The most simple way to enable multi-tile HW but doesn't offer possibility to target specific tiles |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | + D. Contexts with multiple root-devices (multi-card) |
| 105 | + - The most unrestrictive context with queues attached to different root-devices |
| 106 | + - Offers most sharing possibilities at the cost of slow access through host memory or explicit copies needed |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | + Depending on the chosen programming model (A,B,C,D) and algorithm used make sure to do proper memory allocation/synchronization. |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +5 Examples |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | + These are few examples of programming to multiple tiles and multiple cards: |
| 113 | + - https://github.com/jeffhammond/PRK/blob/dpct/Cxx11/dgemm-multigpu-onemkl.cc |
| 114 | + - https://github.com/pvelesko/PPP/tree/master/languages/c%2B%2B/sycl/gpu2gpu |
0 commit comments