Skip to content

Commit 8924c0a

Browse files
Yonghong SongAlexei Starovoitov
authored andcommitted
bpf: Fail verification for sign-extension of packet data/data_end/data_meta
syzbot reported a kernel crash due to commit 1f1e864 ("bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses"). The reason is due to sign-extension of 32-bit load for packet data/data_end/data_meta uapi field. The original code looks like: r2 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 76) /* load __sk_buff->data */ r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 80) /* load __sk_buff->data_end */ r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto +1 ... Note that __sk_buff->data load has 32-bit sign extension. After verification and convert_ctx_accesses(), the final asm code looks like: r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r2 = (s32)r2 r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 ... Note that 'r2 = (s32)r2' may make the kernel __sk_buff->data address invalid which may cause runtime failure. Currently, in C code, typically we have void *data = (void *)(long)skb->data; void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end; ... and it will generate r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 If we allow sign-extension, void *data = (void *)(long)(int)skb->data; void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end; ... the generated code looks like r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r2 <<= 32 r2 s>>= 32 r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 and this will cause verification failure since "r2 <<= 32" is not allowed as "r2" is a packet pointer. To fix this issue for case r2 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 76) /* load __sk_buff->data */ this patch added additional checking in is_valid_access() callback function for packet data/data_end/data_meta access. If those accesses are with sign-extenstion, the verification will fail. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/ Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: 1f1e864 ("bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses") Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
1 parent 3929c8d commit 8924c0a

File tree

3 files changed

+20
-7
lines changed

3 files changed

+20
-7
lines changed

include/linux/bpf.h

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ static_assert(__BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX <= BPF_BASE_TYPE_LIMIT);
920920
*/
921921
struct bpf_insn_access_aux {
922922
enum bpf_reg_type reg_type;
923+
bool is_ldsx;
923924
union {
924925
int ctx_field_size;
925926
struct {

kernel/bpf/verifier.c

Lines changed: 3 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5626,12 +5626,13 @@ static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
56265626
/* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields. Supports fixed offsets only */
56275627
static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int off, int size,
56285628
enum bpf_access_type t, enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type,
5629-
struct btf **btf, u32 *btf_id, bool *is_retval)
5629+
struct btf **btf, u32 *btf_id, bool *is_retval, bool is_ldsx)
56305630
{
56315631
struct bpf_insn_access_aux info = {
56325632
.reg_type = *reg_type,
56335633
.log = &env->log,
56345634
.is_retval = false,
5635+
.is_ldsx = is_ldsx,
56355636
};
56365637

56375638
if (env->ops->is_valid_access &&
@@ -6945,7 +6946,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
69456946
return err;
69466947

69476948
err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, &reg_type, &btf,
6948-
&btf_id, &is_retval);
6949+
&btf_id, &is_retval, is_ldsx);
69496950
if (err)
69506951
verbose_linfo(env, insn_idx, "; ");
69516952
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) {

net/core/filter.c

Lines changed: 16 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8572,13 +8572,16 @@ static bool bpf_skb_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type
85728572
if (off + size > offsetofend(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]))
85738573
return false;
85748574
break;
8575+
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data):
8576+
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data_meta):
8577+
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data_end):
8578+
if (info->is_ldsx || size != size_default)
8579+
return false;
8580+
break;
85758581
case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip6[0], remote_ip6[3]):
85768582
case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct __sk_buff, local_ip6[0], local_ip6[3]):
85778583
case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct __sk_buff, remote_ip4, remote_ip4):
85788584
case bpf_ctx_range_till(struct __sk_buff, local_ip4, local_ip4):
8579-
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data):
8580-
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data_meta):
8581-
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data_end):
85828585
if (size != size_default)
85838586
return false;
85848587
break;
@@ -9022,6 +9025,14 @@ static bool xdp_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
90229025
}
90239026
}
90249027
return false;
9028+
} else {
9029+
switch (off) {
9030+
case offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_meta):
9031+
case offsetof(struct xdp_md, data):
9032+
case offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end):
9033+
if (info->is_ldsx)
9034+
return false;
9035+
}
90259036
}
90269037

90279038
switch (off) {
@@ -9347,12 +9358,12 @@ static bool flow_dissector_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
93479358

93489359
switch (off) {
93499360
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data):
9350-
if (size != size_default)
9361+
if (info->is_ldsx || size != size_default)
93519362
return false;
93529363
info->reg_type = PTR_TO_PACKET;
93539364
return true;
93549365
case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data_end):
9355-
if (size != size_default)
9366+
if (info->is_ldsx || size != size_default)
93569367
return false;
93579368
info->reg_type = PTR_TO_PACKET_END;
93589369
return true;

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)