You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
net: do not delay dst_entries_add() in dst_release()
dst_entries_add() uses per-cpu data that might be freed at netns
dismantle from ip6_route_net_exit() calling dst_entries_destroy()
Before ip6_route_net_exit() can be called, we release all
the dsts associated with this netns, via calls to dst_release(),
which waits an rcu grace period before calling dst_destroy()
dst_entries_add() use in dst_destroy() is racy, because
dst_entries_destroy() could have been called already.
Decrementing the number of dsts must happen sooner.
Notes:
1) in CONFIG_XFRM case, dst_destroy() can call
dst_release_immediate(child), this might also cause UAF
if the child does not have DST_NOCOUNT set.
IPSEC maintainers might take a look and see how to address this.
2) There is also discussion about removing this count of dst,
which might happen in future kernels.
Fixes: f886497 ("ipv4: fix dst race in sk_dst_get()")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANn89iLCCGsP7SFn9HKpvnKu96Td4KD08xf7aGtiYgZnkjaL=w@mail.gmail.com/T/
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: Xin Long <[email protected]>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Xin Long <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
0 commit comments