Skip to content

Added feature gate to restrict to only ingress resources #2579

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

thejasn
Copy link
Contributor

@thejasn thejasn commented Mar 24, 2022

Signed-off-by: thejasn [email protected]

Issue

#2543

Description

Added a feature gate EnableServiceController which controls when the service reconciler is set up.

Checklist

  • Added tests that cover your change (if possible)
  • Added/modified documentation as required (such as the README.md, or the docs directory)
  • Manually tested
  • Made sure the title of the PR is a good description that can go into the release notes

BONUS POINTS checklist: complete for good vibes and maybe prizes?! 🤯

  • Backfilled missing tests for code in same general area 🎉
  • Refactored something and made the world a better place 🌟

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Mar 24, 2022

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: thejasn / name: Thejas N (a67926a984d4185fca7ef20deffee2e9c7d3eb4c)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 24, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @thejasn!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @thejasn. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 24, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 24, 2022
@thejasn thejasn force-pushed the feature/restrict-only-ingress branch from a67926a to 764b4ce Compare March 29, 2022 11:40
@thejasn
Copy link
Contributor Author

thejasn commented Mar 29, 2022

Hey @kishorj, Can you PTAL and add the required labels?

Copy link
Collaborator

@kishorj kishorj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution. We are moving away to the feature gates instead of adding individual flags,

type FeatureGates interface {

We can use the EnableServiceController or a similar feature gate for this.

@thejasn thejasn force-pushed the feature/restrict-only-ingress branch from 764b4ce to f0e348e Compare March 30, 2022 13:57
@thejasn thejasn changed the title Added cmdline option to restrict to only ingress resources Added feature gate to restrict to only ingress resources Mar 30, 2022
@thejasn
Copy link
Contributor Author

thejasn commented Mar 30, 2022

Thanks for the contribution. We are moving away to the feature gates instead of adding individual flags,

type FeatureGates interface {

We can use the EnableServiceController or a similar feature gate for this.

Hey @kishorj, I've made the necessary changes. Let me know anything else is needed.

@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Mar 30, 2022

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 30, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2579 (f0e348e) into main (88b6bdc) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2579      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   53.85%   53.83%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         144      144              
  Lines        8165     8168       +3     
==========================================
  Hits         4397     4397              
- Misses       3451     3454       +3     
  Partials      317      317              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/config/feature_gates.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/targetgroupbinding/resource_manager.go 15.17% <0.00%> (-0.11%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 88b6bdc...f0e348e. Read the comment docs.

@thejasn
Copy link
Contributor Author

thejasn commented Apr 1, 2022

Hey @kishorj, do let me know what else is needed to get this merged. Thanks

@thejasn
Copy link
Contributor Author

thejasn commented Apr 5, 2022

Hey @kishorj, checking in with you if anything else is needed from my side in order to proceed.

@kishorj
Copy link
Collaborator

kishorj commented Apr 12, 2022

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 12, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kishorj, thejasn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 20, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f6735b5 into kubernetes-sigs:main Apr 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants