Skip to content

Commit 671a6cd

Browse files
committed
Handle duplicate payment claims during initialization
In the next commit we'll start using (much of) the normal HTLC claim pipeline to replay payment claims on startup. In order to do so, however, we have to properly handle cases where we get a `DuplicateClaim` back from the channel for an inbound-payment HTLC. Here we do so, handling the `MonitorUpdateCompletionAction` and allowing an already-completed RAA blocker.
1 parent 945be3d commit 671a6cd

File tree

1 file changed

+37
-25
lines changed

1 file changed

+37
-25
lines changed

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs

Lines changed: 37 additions & 25 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6962,7 +6962,16 @@ where
69626962
UpdateFulfillCommitFetch::DuplicateClaim {} => {
69636963
let (action_opt, raa_blocker_opt) = completion_action(None, true);
69646964
if let Some(raa_blocker) = raa_blocker_opt {
6965-
debug_assert!(peer_state.actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates.get(&chan_id).unwrap().contains(&raa_blocker));
6965+
// If we're making a claim during startup, its a replay of a
6966+
// payment claim from a `ChannelMonitor`. In some cases (MPP or
6967+
// if the HTLC was only recently removed) we make such claims
6968+
// after an HTLC has been removed from a channel entirely, and
6969+
// thus the RAA blocker has long since completed.
6970+
//
6971+
// In any other case, the RAA blocker must still be present and
6972+
// blocking RAAs.
6973+
debug_assert!(during_init ||
6974+
peer_state.actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates.get(&chan_id).unwrap().contains(&raa_blocker));
69666975
}
69676976
let action = if let Some(action) = action_opt {
69686977
action
@@ -6974,38 +6983,41 @@ where
69746983

69756984
log_trace!(logger, "Completing monitor update completion action for channel {} as claim was redundant: {:?}",
69766985
chan_id, action);
6977-
let (node_id, _funding_outpoint, channel_id, blocker) =
69786986
if let MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::FreeOtherChannelImmediately {
69796987
downstream_counterparty_node_id: node_id,
6980-
downstream_funding_outpoint: funding_outpoint,
6988+
downstream_funding_outpoint: _,
69816989
blocking_action: blocker, downstream_channel_id: channel_id,
69826990
} = action {
6983-
(node_id, funding_outpoint, channel_id, blocker)
6991+
if let Some(peer_state_mtx) = per_peer_state.get(&node_id) {
6992+
let mut peer_state = peer_state_mtx.lock().unwrap();
6993+
if let Some(blockers) = peer_state
6994+
.actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates
6995+
.get_mut(&channel_id)
6996+
{
6997+
let mut found_blocker = false;
6998+
blockers.retain(|iter| {
6999+
// Note that we could actually be blocked, in
7000+
// which case we need to only remove the one
7001+
// blocker which was added duplicatively.
7002+
let first_blocker = !found_blocker;
7003+
if *iter == blocker { found_blocker = true; }
7004+
*iter != blocker || !first_blocker
7005+
});
7006+
debug_assert!(found_blocker);
7007+
}
7008+
} else {
7009+
debug_assert!(false);
7010+
}
7011+
} else if matches!(action, MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::PaymentClaimed { .. }) {
7012+
debug_assert!(during_init,
7013+
"Duplicate claims should always either be for forwarded payments(freeing another channel immediately) or during init (for claim replay)");
7014+
mem::drop(per_peer_state);
7015+
self.handle_monitor_update_completion_actions([action]);
69847016
} else {
69857017
debug_assert!(false,
6986-
"Duplicate claims should always free another channel immediately");
7018+
"Duplicate claims should always either be for forwarded payments(freeing another channel immediately) or during init (for claim replay)");
69877019
return;
69887020
};
6989-
if let Some(peer_state_mtx) = per_peer_state.get(&node_id) {
6990-
let mut peer_state = peer_state_mtx.lock().unwrap();
6991-
if let Some(blockers) = peer_state
6992-
.actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates
6993-
.get_mut(&channel_id)
6994-
{
6995-
let mut found_blocker = false;
6996-
blockers.retain(|iter| {
6997-
// Note that we could actually be blocked, in
6998-
// which case we need to only remove the one
6999-
// blocker which was added duplicatively.
7000-
let first_blocker = !found_blocker;
7001-
if *iter == blocker { found_blocker = true; }
7002-
*iter != blocker || !first_blocker
7003-
});
7004-
debug_assert!(found_blocker);
7005-
}
7006-
} else {
7007-
debug_assert!(false);
7008-
}
70097021
}
70107022
}
70117023
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)