@@ -109,50 +109,79 @@ use crate::ln::script::ShutdownScript;
109
109
// Alternatively, we can fill an outbound HTLC with a HTLCSource::OutboundRoute indicating this is
110
110
// our payment, which we can use to decode errors or inform the user that the payment was sent.
111
111
112
- /// Routing info for an inbound HTLC onion.
112
+ /// Information about where a received HTLC('s onion) has indicated the HTLC should go .
113
113
#[derive(Clone)] // See Channel::revoke_and_ack for why, tl;dr: Rust bug
114
114
pub enum PendingHTLCRouting {
115
- /// A forwarded HTLC .
115
+ /// An HTLC which should be forwarded on to another node .
116
116
Forward {
117
- /// BOLT 4 onion packet.
117
+ /// The onion which should be included in the forwarded HTLC, telling the next hop what to
118
+ /// do with the HTLC.
118
119
onion_packet: msgs::OnionPacket,
119
- /// The SCID from the onion that we should forward to. This could be a real SCID or a fake one
120
- /// generated using `get_fake_scid` from the scid_utils::fake_scid module.
120
+ /// The short channel ID of the channel which we were instructed to forward this HTLC to.
121
+ ///
122
+ /// This could be a real on-chain SCID, an SCID alias, or some other SCID which has meaning
123
+ /// to the receiving node, such as one returned from
124
+ /// [`ChannelManager::get_intercept_scid`] or [`ChannelManager::get_phantom_scid`].
121
125
short_channel_id: u64, // This should be NonZero<u64> eventually when we bump MSRV
122
126
/// Set if this HTLC is being forwarded within a blinded path.
123
127
blinded: Option<BlindedForward>,
124
128
},
125
- /// An HTLC paid to an invoice (supposedly) generated by us.
126
- /// At this point, we have not checked that the invoice being paid was actually generated by us,
127
- /// but rather it's claiming to pay an invoice of ours.
129
+ /// The onion indicates that this is a payment for an invoice (supposedly) generated by us.
130
+ ///
131
+ /// Note that at this point, we have not checked that the invoice being paid was actually
132
+ /// generated by us, but rather it's claiming to pay an invoice of ours.
128
133
Receive {
129
- /// Payment secret and total msat received.
134
+ /// Information about the amount the sender intended to pay and (potential) proof that this
135
+ /// is a payment for an invoice we generated. This proof of payment is is also used for
136
+ /// linking MPP parts of a larger payment.
130
137
payment_data: msgs::FinalOnionHopData,
131
- /// See [`RecipientOnionFields::payment_metadata`] for more info.
138
+ /// Additional data which we (allegedly) instructed the sender to include in the onion.
139
+ ///
140
+ /// For HTLCs received by LDK, this will ultimately be exposed in
141
+ /// [`Event::PaymentClaimable::onion_fields`] as
142
+ /// [`RecipientOnionFields::payment_metadata`].
132
143
payment_metadata: Option<Vec<u8>>,
133
144
/// CLTV expiry of the received HTLC.
145
+ ///
134
146
/// Used to track when we should expire pending HTLCs that go unclaimed.
135
147
incoming_cltv_expiry: u32,
136
- /// Shared secret derived using a phantom node secret key. If this field is Some, the
137
- /// payment was sent to a phantom node (one hop beyond the current node), but can be
138
- /// settled by this node .
148
+ /// If the onion had forwarding instructions to one of our phantom node SCIDs, this will
149
+ /// provide the onion shared secret used to decrypt the next level of forwarding
150
+ /// instructions .
139
151
phantom_shared_secret: Option<[u8; 32]>,
140
- /// See [`RecipientOnionFields::custom_tlvs`] for more info.
152
+ /// Custom TLVs which were set by the sender.
153
+ ///
154
+ /// For HTLCs received by LDK, this will ultimately be exposed in
155
+ /// [`Event::PaymentClaimable::onion_fields`] as
156
+ /// [`RecipientOnionFields::custom_tlvs`].
141
157
custom_tlvs: Vec<(u64, Vec<u8>)>,
142
158
},
143
- /// Incoming keysend (sender provided the preimage in a TLV).
159
+ /// The onion indicates that this is for payment to us but which contains the preimage for
160
+ /// claiming included, and is unrelated to any invoice we'd previously generated (aka a
161
+ /// "keysend" or "spontaneous" payment).
144
162
ReceiveKeysend {
145
- /// This was added in 0.0.116 and will break deserialization on downgrades.
163
+ /// Information about the amount the sender intended to pay and possibly a token to
164
+ /// associate MPP parts of a larger payment.
165
+ ///
166
+ /// This will only be filled in if receiving MPP keysend payments is enabled, and it being
167
+ /// present will cause deserialization to fail on versions of LDK prior to 0.0.116.
146
168
payment_data: Option<msgs::FinalOnionHopData>,
147
169
/// Preimage for this onion payment. This preimage is provided by the sender and will be
148
170
/// used to settle the spontaneous payment.
149
171
payment_preimage: PaymentPreimage,
150
- /// See [`RecipientOnionFields::payment_metadata`] for more info.
172
+ /// Additional data which we (allegedly) instructed the sender to include in the onion.
173
+ ///
174
+ /// For HTLCs received by LDK, this will ultimately bubble back up as
175
+ /// [`RecipientOnionFields::payment_metadata`].
151
176
payment_metadata: Option<Vec<u8>>,
152
177
/// CLTV expiry of the received HTLC.
178
+ ///
153
179
/// Used to track when we should expire pending HTLCs that go unclaimed.
154
180
incoming_cltv_expiry: u32,
155
- /// See [`RecipientOnionFields::custom_tlvs`] for more info.
181
+ /// Custom TLVs which were set by the sender.
182
+ ///
183
+ /// For HTLCs received by LDK, these will ultimately bubble back up as
184
+ /// [`RecipientOnionFields::custom_tlvs`].
156
185
custom_tlvs: Vec<(u64, Vec<u8>)>,
157
186
},
158
187
}
0 commit comments