Skip to content

Commit 9d49c5c

Browse files
committed
Fix re-sending commitment updates with an outbound fee update
When we send an update_fee to our counterparty on an outbound channel, if we need to re-send a commitment update after reconnection, the update_fee must be present in the re-sent commitment update messages. However, wewere always setting the update_fee field in the commitment update to None, causing us to generate invalid commitment signatures and get channel force-closures. This fixes the issue by correctly detecting when an update_fee needs to be re-sent, doing so when required.
1 parent b09a60b commit 9d49c5c

File tree

2 files changed

+103
-4
lines changed

2 files changed

+103
-4
lines changed

lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs

Lines changed: 92 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2054,6 +2054,98 @@ fn test_path_paused_mpp() {
20542054
claim_payment_along_route(&nodes[0], &[&[&nodes[1], &nodes[3]], &[&nodes[2], &nodes[3]]], false, payment_preimage);
20552055
}
20562056

2057+
fn do_update_fee_resend_test(deliver_update: bool, parallel_updates: bool) {
2058+
// In early versions we did not handle resending of update_fee on reconnect correctly. The
2059+
// chanmon_consistency fuzz target, of course, immediately found it, but we test a few cases
2060+
// explicitly here.
2061+
let chanmon_cfgs = create_chanmon_cfgs(2);
2062+
let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
2063+
let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &[None, None]);
2064+
let mut nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
2065+
2066+
create_announced_chan_between_nodes(&nodes, 0, 1, InitFeatures::known(), InitFeatures::known());
2067+
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000);
2068+
2069+
{
2070+
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
2071+
*feerate_lock += 20;
2072+
}
2073+
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
2074+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2075+
let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2076+
assert!(update_msgs.update_fee.is_some());
2077+
if deliver_update {
2078+
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msgs.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
2079+
}
2080+
2081+
if parallel_updates {
2082+
{
2083+
let mut feerate_lock = chanmon_cfgs[0].fee_estimator.sat_per_kw.lock().unwrap();
2084+
*feerate_lock += 20;
2085+
}
2086+
nodes[0].node.timer_tick_occurred();
2087+
assert!(nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
2088+
}
2089+
2090+
nodes[0].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
2091+
nodes[1].node.peer_disconnected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), false);
2092+
2093+
nodes[0].node.peer_connected(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
2094+
let as_connect_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2095+
nodes[1].node.peer_connected(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &msgs::Init { features: InitFeatures::known() });
2096+
let bs_connect_msg = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendChannelReestablish, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2097+
2098+
nodes[1].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_connect_msg);
2099+
assert!(nodes[1].node.get_and_clear_pending_msg_events().is_empty());
2100+
2101+
nodes[0].node.handle_channel_reestablish(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_connect_msg);
2102+
let update_msgs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2103+
assert!(update_msgs.update_fee.is_some());
2104+
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), update_msgs.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
2105+
if parallel_updates {
2106+
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &update_msgs.commitment_signed);
2107+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2108+
let (bs_first_raa, bs_first_cs) = get_revoke_commit_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2109+
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_first_raa);
2110+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2111+
let as_second_update = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[0], nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2112+
2113+
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_first_cs);
2114+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2115+
let as_first_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2116+
2117+
nodes[1].node.handle_update_fee(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), as_second_update.update_fee.as_ref().unwrap());
2118+
nodes[1].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_update.commitment_signed);
2119+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2120+
let bs_second_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[1], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2121+
2122+
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_first_raa);
2123+
let bs_second_cs = get_htlc_update_msgs!(nodes[1], nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id());
2124+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2125+
2126+
nodes[0].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_raa);
2127+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2128+
2129+
nodes[0].node.handle_commitment_signed(&nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &bs_second_cs.commitment_signed);
2130+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[0], 1);
2131+
let as_second_raa = get_event_msg!(nodes[0], MessageSendEvent::SendRevokeAndACK, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id());
2132+
2133+
nodes[1].node.handle_revoke_and_ack(&nodes[0].node.get_our_node_id(), &as_second_raa);
2134+
check_added_monitors!(nodes[1], 1);
2135+
} else {
2136+
commitment_signed_dance!(nodes[1], nodes[0], update_msgs.commitment_signed, false);
2137+
}
2138+
2139+
send_payment(&nodes[0], &[&nodes[1]], 1000);
2140+
}
2141+
#[test]
2142+
fn update_fee_resend_test() {
2143+
do_update_fee_resend_test(false, false);
2144+
do_update_fee_resend_test(true, false);
2145+
do_update_fee_resend_test(false, true);
2146+
do_update_fee_resend_test(true, true);
2147+
}
2148+
20572149
fn do_channel_holding_cell_serialize(disconnect: bool, reload_a: bool) {
20582150
// Tests that, when we serialize a channel with AddHTLC entries in the holding cell, we
20592151
// properly free them on reconnect. We previously failed such HTLCs upon serialization, but

lightning/src/ln/channel.rs

Lines changed: 11 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3145,11 +3145,18 @@ impl<Signer: Sign> Channel<Signer> {
31453145
}
31463146
}
31473147

3148-
log_trace!(logger, "Regenerated latest commitment update in channel {} with {} update_adds, {} update_fulfills, {} update_fails, and {} update_fail_malformeds",
3149-
log_bytes!(self.channel_id()), update_add_htlcs.len(), update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), update_fail_htlcs.len(), update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len());
3148+
let update_fee = if self.is_outbound() && self.pending_update_fee.is_some() {
3149+
Some(msgs::UpdateFee {
3150+
channel_id: self.channel_id(),
3151+
feerate_per_kw: self.pending_update_fee.unwrap(),
3152+
})
3153+
} else { None };
3154+
3155+
log_trace!(logger, "Regenerated latest commitment update in channel {} with{} {} update_adds, {} update_fulfills, {} update_fails, and {} update_fail_malformeds",
3156+
log_bytes!(self.channel_id()), if update_fee.is_some() { " update_fee," } else { "" },
3157+
update_add_htlcs.len(), update_fulfill_htlcs.len(), update_fail_htlcs.len(), update_fail_malformed_htlcs.len());
31503158
msgs::CommitmentUpdate {
3151-
update_add_htlcs, update_fulfill_htlcs, update_fail_htlcs, update_fail_malformed_htlcs,
3152-
update_fee: None,
3159+
update_add_htlcs, update_fulfill_htlcs, update_fail_htlcs, update_fail_malformed_htlcs, update_fee,
31533160
commitment_signed: self.send_commitment_no_state_update(logger).expect("It looks like we failed to re-generate a commitment_signed we had previously sent?").0,
31543161
}
31553162
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)