Skip to content

Commit c37737c

Browse files
committed
Split InvoiceRequest::verify_and_respond_using_derived_keys
InvoiceRequest::verify_and_respond_using_derived_keys takes a payment hash. To avoid generating one for invoice requests that ultimately cannot be verified, split the method into one for verifying and another for responding.
1 parent 32d6e91 commit c37737c

File tree

2 files changed

+91
-49
lines changed

2 files changed

+91
-49
lines changed

lightning/src/offers/invoice.rs

Lines changed: 9 additions & 14 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1642,36 +1642,31 @@ mod tests {
16421642
.build().unwrap()
16431643
.sign(payer_sign).unwrap();
16441644

1645-
if let Err(e) = invoice_request
1646-
.verify_and_respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(
1647-
payment_paths(), payment_hash(), now(), &expanded_key, &secp_ctx
1648-
)
1649-
.unwrap()
1645+
if let Err(e) = invoice_request.clone()
1646+
.verify(&expanded_key, &secp_ctx).unwrap()
1647+
.respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(payment_paths(), payment_hash(), now()).unwrap()
16501648
.build_and_sign(&secp_ctx)
16511649
{
16521650
panic!("error building invoice: {:?}", e);
16531651
}
16541652

16551653
let expanded_key = ExpandedKey::new(&KeyMaterial([41; 32]));
1656-
match invoice_request.verify_and_respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(
1657-
payment_paths(), payment_hash(), now(), &expanded_key, &secp_ctx
1658-
) {
1659-
Ok(_) => panic!("expected error"),
1660-
Err(e) => assert_eq!(e, Bolt12SemanticError::InvalidMetadata),
1661-
}
1654+
assert!(invoice_request.verify(&expanded_key, &secp_ctx).is_err());
16621655

16631656
let desc = "foo".to_string();
16641657
let offer = OfferBuilder
16651658
::deriving_signing_pubkey(desc, node_id, &expanded_key, &entropy, &secp_ctx)
16661659
.amount_msats(1000)
1660+
// Omit the path so that node_id is used for the signing pubkey instead of deriving
16671661
.build().unwrap();
16681662
let invoice_request = offer.request_invoice(vec![1; 32], payer_pubkey()).unwrap()
16691663
.build().unwrap()
16701664
.sign(payer_sign).unwrap();
16711665

1672-
match invoice_request.verify_and_respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(
1673-
payment_paths(), payment_hash(), now(), &expanded_key, &secp_ctx
1674-
) {
1666+
match invoice_request
1667+
.verify(&expanded_key, &secp_ctx).unwrap()
1668+
.respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(payment_paths(), payment_hash(), now())
1669+
{
16751670
Ok(_) => panic!("expected error"),
16761671
Err(e) => assert_eq!(e, Bolt12SemanticError::InvalidMetadata),
16771672
}

lightning/src/offers/invoice_request.rs

Lines changed: 82 additions & 35 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -424,6 +424,22 @@ pub struct InvoiceRequest {
424424
signature: Signature,
425425
}
426426

427+
/// An [`InvoiceRequest`] that has been verified by [`InvoiceRequest::verify`] and exposes different
428+
/// ways to respond depending on whether the signing keys were derived.
429+
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
430+
pub struct VerifiedInvoiceRequest {
431+
/// The verified request.
432+
pub inner: InvoiceRequest,
433+
434+
/// Keys used for signing a [`Bolt12Invoice`] if they can be derived.
435+
///
436+
/// If `Some`, then must respond with methods that use derived keys. Otherwise, should respond
437+
/// with an invoice signed explicitly.
438+
///
439+
/// [`Bolt12Invoice`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice
440+
pub keys: Option<KeyPair>,
441+
}
442+
427443
/// The contents of an [`InvoiceRequest`], which may be shared with an [`Bolt12Invoice`].
428444
///
429445
/// [`Bolt12Invoice`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice
@@ -556,6 +572,60 @@ impl InvoiceRequest {
556572
InvoiceBuilder::for_offer(self, payment_paths, created_at, payment_hash)
557573
}
558574

575+
/// Verifies that the request was for an offer created using the given key. Returns the verified
576+
/// request along with the derived keys needed to sign a [`Bolt12Invoice`] for the request if
577+
/// they could be extracted from the metadata.
578+
///
579+
/// [`Bolt12Invoice`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice
580+
pub fn verify<T: secp256k1::Signing>(
581+
self, key: &ExpandedKey, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>
582+
) -> Result<VerifiedInvoiceRequest, ()> {
583+
let keys = self.contents.inner.offer.verify(&self.bytes, key, secp_ctx)?;
584+
Ok(VerifiedInvoiceRequest {
585+
inner: self,
586+
keys,
587+
})
588+
}
589+
590+
#[cfg(test)]
591+
fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef {
592+
let (payer_tlv_stream, offer_tlv_stream, invoice_request_tlv_stream) =
593+
self.contents.as_tlv_stream();
594+
let signature_tlv_stream = SignatureTlvStreamRef {
595+
signature: Some(&self.signature),
596+
};
597+
(payer_tlv_stream, offer_tlv_stream, invoice_request_tlv_stream, signature_tlv_stream)
598+
}
599+
}
600+
601+
impl VerifiedInvoiceRequest {
602+
/// Creates an [`InvoiceBuilder`] for the request with the given required fields and using the
603+
/// [`Duration`] since [`std::time::SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH`] as the creation time.
604+
///
605+
/// See [`InvoiceRequest::respond_with_no_std`] for further details.
606+
///
607+
/// This is not exported to bindings users as builder patterns don't map outside of move semantics.
608+
///
609+
/// [`Duration`]: core::time::Duration
610+
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
611+
pub fn respond_with(
612+
&self, payment_paths: Vec<(BlindedPayInfo, BlindedPath)>, payment_hash: PaymentHash
613+
) -> Result<InvoiceBuilder<ExplicitSigningPubkey>, Bolt12SemanticError> {
614+
self.inner.respond_with(payment_paths, payment_hash)
615+
}
616+
617+
/// Creates an [`InvoiceBuilder`] for the request with the given required fields.
618+
///
619+
/// See [`InvoiceRequest::respond_with_no_std`] for further details.
620+
///
621+
/// This is not exported to bindings users as builder patterns don't map outside of move semantics.
622+
pub fn respond_with_no_std(
623+
&self, payment_paths: Vec<(BlindedPayInfo, BlindedPath)>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
624+
created_at: core::time::Duration
625+
) -> Result<InvoiceBuilder<ExplicitSigningPubkey>, Bolt12SemanticError> {
626+
self.inner.respond_with_no_std(payment_paths, payment_hash, created_at)
627+
}
628+
559629
/// Creates an [`InvoiceBuilder`] for the request using the given required fields and that uses
560630
/// derived signing keys from the originating [`Offer`] to sign the [`Bolt12Invoice`]. Must use
561631
/// the same [`ExpandedKey`] as the one used to create the offer.
@@ -566,17 +636,14 @@ impl InvoiceRequest {
566636
///
567637
/// [`Bolt12Invoice`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice
568638
#[cfg(feature = "std")]
569-
pub fn verify_and_respond_using_derived_keys<T: secp256k1::Signing>(
570-
&self, payment_paths: Vec<(BlindedPayInfo, BlindedPath)>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
571-
expanded_key: &ExpandedKey, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>
639+
pub fn respond_using_derived_keys(
640+
&self, payment_paths: Vec<(BlindedPayInfo, BlindedPath)>, payment_hash: PaymentHash
572641
) -> Result<InvoiceBuilder<DerivedSigningPubkey>, Bolt12SemanticError> {
573642
let created_at = std::time::SystemTime::now()
574643
.duration_since(std::time::SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH)
575644
.expect("SystemTime::now() should come after SystemTime::UNIX_EPOCH");
576645

577-
self.verify_and_respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(
578-
payment_paths, payment_hash, created_at, expanded_key, secp_ctx
579-
)
646+
self.respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(payment_paths, payment_hash, created_at)
580647
}
581648

582649
/// Creates an [`InvoiceBuilder`] for the request using the given required fields and that uses
@@ -588,42 +655,22 @@ impl InvoiceRequest {
588655
/// This is not exported to bindings users as builder patterns don't map outside of move semantics.
589656
///
590657
/// [`Bolt12Invoice`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice
591-
pub fn verify_and_respond_using_derived_keys_no_std<T: secp256k1::Signing>(
658+
pub fn respond_using_derived_keys_no_std(
592659
&self, payment_paths: Vec<(BlindedPayInfo, BlindedPath)>, payment_hash: PaymentHash,
593-
created_at: core::time::Duration, expanded_key: &ExpandedKey, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>
660+
created_at: core::time::Duration
594661
) -> Result<InvoiceBuilder<DerivedSigningPubkey>, Bolt12SemanticError> {
595-
if self.invoice_request_features().requires_unknown_bits() {
662+
if self.inner.invoice_request_features().requires_unknown_bits() {
596663
return Err(Bolt12SemanticError::UnknownRequiredFeatures);
597664
}
598665

599-
let keys = match self.verify(expanded_key, secp_ctx) {
600-
Err(()) => return Err(Bolt12SemanticError::InvalidMetadata),
601-
Ok(None) => return Err(Bolt12SemanticError::InvalidMetadata),
602-
Ok(Some(keys)) => keys,
666+
let keys = match self.keys {
667+
None => return Err(Bolt12SemanticError::InvalidMetadata),
668+
Some(keys) => keys,
603669
};
604670

605-
InvoiceBuilder::for_offer_using_keys(self, payment_paths, created_at, payment_hash, keys)
606-
}
607-
608-
/// Verifies that the request was for an offer created using the given key. Returns the derived
609-
/// keys need to sign an [`Bolt12Invoice`] for the request if they could be extracted from the
610-
/// metadata.
611-
///
612-
/// [`Bolt12Invoice`]: crate::offers::invoice::Bolt12Invoice
613-
pub fn verify<T: secp256k1::Signing>(
614-
&self, key: &ExpandedKey, secp_ctx: &Secp256k1<T>
615-
) -> Result<Option<KeyPair>, ()> {
616-
self.contents.inner.offer.verify(&self.bytes, key, secp_ctx)
617-
}
618-
619-
#[cfg(test)]
620-
fn as_tlv_stream(&self) -> FullInvoiceRequestTlvStreamRef {
621-
let (payer_tlv_stream, offer_tlv_stream, invoice_request_tlv_stream) =
622-
self.contents.as_tlv_stream();
623-
let signature_tlv_stream = SignatureTlvStreamRef {
624-
signature: Some(&self.signature),
625-
};
626-
(payer_tlv_stream, offer_tlv_stream, invoice_request_tlv_stream, signature_tlv_stream)
671+
InvoiceBuilder::for_offer_using_keys(
672+
&self.inner, payment_paths, created_at, payment_hash, keys
673+
)
627674
}
628675
}
629676

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)