Add logger as parameter in creating ChannelContext

Author: alecchendev

lightning/src/ln/channel.rs

@@ -1882,7 +1882,7 @@ impl<SP: Deref> ChannelContext<SP> where SP::Target: SignerProvider  {
 		Ok(channel_context)
 	}
 
-	fn new_for_outbound_channel<'a, ES: Deref, F: Deref>(
+	fn new_for_outbound_channel<'a, ES: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref>(
 		fee_estimator: &'a LowerBoundedFeeEstimator<F>,
 		entropy_source: &'a ES,
 		signer_provider: &'a SP,
@@ -1899,11 +1899,13 @@ impl<SP: Deref> ChannelContext<SP> where SP::Target: SignerProvider  {
 		channel_keys_id: [u8; 32],
 		holder_signer: <SP::Target as SignerProvider>::EcdsaSigner,
 		pubkeys: ChannelPublicKeys,
+		logger: &L,
 	) -> Result<ChannelContext<SP>, APIError>
 		where
 			ES::Target: EntropySource,
 			F::Target: FeeEstimator,
 			SP::Target: SignerProvider,
+			L::Target: Logger,
 	{
 		// This will be updated with the counterparty contribution if this is a dual-funded channel
 		let channel_value_satoshis = funding_satoshis;
@@ -7372,13 +7374,14 @@ pub(super) struct OutboundV1Channel<SP: Deref> where SP::Target: SignerProvider
 }
 
 impl<SP: Deref> OutboundV1Channel<SP> where SP::Target: SignerProvider {
-	pub fn new<ES: Deref, F: Deref>(
+	pub fn new<ES: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref>(
 		fee_estimator: &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator<F>, entropy_source: &ES, signer_provider: &SP, counterparty_node_id: PublicKey, their_features: &InitFeatures,
 		channel_value_satoshis: u64, push_msat: u64, user_id: u128, config: &UserConfig, current_chain_height: u32,
-		outbound_scid_alias: u64, temporary_channel_id: Option<ChannelId>
+		outbound_scid_alias: u64, temporary_channel_id: Option<ChannelId>, logger: &L
 	) -> Result<OutboundV1Channel<SP>, APIError>
 	where ES::Target: EntropySource,
-	      F::Target: FeeEstimator
+	      F::Target: FeeEstimator,
+	      L::Target: Logger,
 	{
 		let holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis = get_holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis(channel_value_satoshis, config);
 		if holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis < MIN_CHAN_DUST_LIMIT_SATOSHIS {
@@ -7410,6 +7413,7 @@ impl<SP: Deref> OutboundV1Channel<SP> where SP::Target: SignerProvider {
 				channel_keys_id,
 				holder_signer,
 				pubkeys,
+				logger,
 			)?,
 			unfunded_context: UnfundedChannelContext { unfunded_channel_age_ticks: 0 }
 		};
@@ -8105,14 +8109,15 @@ pub(super) struct OutboundV2Channel<SP: Deref> where SP::Target: SignerProvider
 
 #[cfg(any(dual_funding, splicing))]
 impl<SP: Deref> OutboundV2Channel<SP> where SP::Target: SignerProvider {
-	pub fn new<ES: Deref, F: Deref>(
+	pub fn new<ES: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref>(
 		fee_estimator: &LowerBoundedFeeEstimator<F>, entropy_source: &ES, signer_provider: &SP,
 		counterparty_node_id: PublicKey, their_features: &InitFeatures, funding_satoshis: u64,
 		user_id: u128, config: &UserConfig, current_chain_height: u32, outbound_scid_alias: u64,
-		funding_confirmation_target: ConfirmationTarget,
+		funding_confirmation_target: ConfirmationTarget, logger: &L,
 	) -> Result<OutboundV2Channel<SP>, APIError>
 	where ES::Target: EntropySource,
 	      F::Target: FeeEstimator,
+	      L::Target: Logger,
 	{
 		let channel_keys_id = signer_provider.generate_channel_keys_id(false, funding_satoshis, user_id);
 		let holder_signer = signer_provider.derive_channel_signer(funding_satoshis, channel_keys_id);
@@ -8144,6 +8149,7 @@ impl<SP: Deref> OutboundV2Channel<SP> where SP::Target: SignerProvider {
 				channel_keys_id,
 				holder_signer,
 				pubkeys,
+				logger,
 			)?,
 			unfunded_context: UnfundedChannelContext { unfunded_channel_age_ticks: 0 },
 			dual_funding_context: DualFundingChannelContext {
@@ -9523,11 +9529,12 @@ mod tests {
 		keys_provider.expect(OnGetShutdownScriptpubkey {
 			returns: non_v0_segwit_shutdown_script.clone(),
 		});
+		let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
 
 		let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
 		let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
 		let config = UserConfig::default();
-		match OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&TestFeeEstimator { fee_est: 253 }), &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id, &features, 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None) {
+		match OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&TestFeeEstimator { fee_est: 253 }), &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id, &features, 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger) {
 			Err(APIError::IncompatibleShutdownScript { script }) => {
 				assert_eq!(script.into_inner(), non_v0_segwit_shutdown_script.into_inner());
 			},
@@ -9547,10 +9554,11 @@ mod tests {
 		let seed = [42; 32];
 		let network = Network::Testnet;
 		let keys_provider = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, network);
+		let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
 
 		let node_a_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
 		let config = UserConfig::default();
-		let node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&bounded_fee_estimator, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_a_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&bounded_fee_estimator, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_a_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 
 		// Now change the fee so we can check that the fee in the open_channel message is the
 		// same as the old fee.
@@ -9577,7 +9585,7 @@ mod tests {
 		// Create Node A's channel pointing to Node B's pubkey
 		let node_b_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
 		let config = UserConfig::default();
-		let mut node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let mut node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 
 		// Create Node B's channel by receiving Node A's open_channel message
 		// Make sure A's dust limit is as we expect.
@@ -9657,10 +9665,11 @@ mod tests {
 		let seed = [42; 32];
 		let network = Network::Testnet;
 		let keys_provider = test_utils::TestKeysInterface::new(&seed, network);
+		let logger = test_utils::TestLogger::new();
 
 		let node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
 		let config = UserConfig::default();
-		let mut chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&fee_est, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let mut chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&fee_est, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 
 		let commitment_tx_fee_0_htlcs = commit_tx_fee_msat(chan.context.feerate_per_kw, 0, chan.context.get_channel_type());
 		let commitment_tx_fee_1_htlc = commit_tx_fee_msat(chan.context.feerate_per_kw, 1, chan.context.get_channel_type());
@@ -9709,7 +9718,7 @@ mod tests {
 		// Create Node A's channel pointing to Node B's pubkey
 		let node_b_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
 		let config = UserConfig::default();
-		let mut node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let mut node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 
 		// Create Node B's channel by receiving Node A's open_channel message
 		let open_channel_msg = node_a_chan.get_open_channel(chain_hash);
@@ -9773,12 +9782,12 @@ mod tests {
 		// Test that `OutboundV1Channel::new` creates a channel with the correct value for
 		// `holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat`, when configured with a valid percentage value,
 		// which is set to the lower bound + 1 (2%) of the `channel_value`.
-		let chan_1 = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config_2_percent), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config_2_percent, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let chan_1 = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config_2_percent), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config_2_percent, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 		let chan_1_value_msat = chan_1.context.channel_value_satoshis * 1000;
 		assert_eq!(chan_1.context.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat, (chan_1_value_msat as f64 * 0.02) as u64);
 
 		// Test with the upper bound - 1 of valid values (99%).
-		let chan_2 = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config_99_percent), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config_99_percent, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let chan_2 = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config_99_percent), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config_99_percent, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 		let chan_2_value_msat = chan_2.context.channel_value_satoshis * 1000;
 		assert_eq!(chan_2.context.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat, (chan_2_value_msat as f64 * 0.99) as u64);
 
@@ -9798,14 +9807,14 @@ mod tests {
 
 		// Test that `OutboundV1Channel::new` uses the lower bound of the configurable percentage values (1%)
 		// if `max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel` is set to a value less than 1.
-		let chan_5 = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config_0_percent), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config_0_percent, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let chan_5 = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config_0_percent), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config_0_percent, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 		let chan_5_value_msat = chan_5.context.channel_value_satoshis * 1000;
 		assert_eq!(chan_5.context.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat, (chan_5_value_msat as f64 * 0.01) as u64);
 
 		// Test that `OutboundV1Channel::new` uses the upper bound of the configurable percentage values
 		// (100%) if `max_inbound_htlc_value_in_flight_percent_of_channel` is set to a larger value
 		// than 100.
-		let chan_6 = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config_101_percent), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config_101_percent, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let chan_6 = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config_101_percent), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config_101_percent, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 		let chan_6_value_msat = chan_6.context.channel_value_satoshis * 1000;
 		assert_eq!(chan_6.context.holder_max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat, chan_6_value_msat);
 
@@ -9858,7 +9867,7 @@ mod tests {
 
 		let mut outbound_node_config = UserConfig::default();
 		outbound_node_config.channel_handshake_config.their_channel_reserve_proportional_millionths = (outbound_selected_channel_reserve_perc * 1_000_000.0) as u32;
-		let chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&&fee_est, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&outbound_node_config), channel_value_satoshis, 100_000, 42, &outbound_node_config, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&&fee_est, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, outbound_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&outbound_node_config), channel_value_satoshis, 100_000, 42, &outbound_node_config, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 
 		let expected_outbound_selected_chan_reserve = cmp::max(MIN_THEIR_CHAN_RESERVE_SATOSHIS, (chan.context.channel_value_satoshis as f64 * outbound_selected_channel_reserve_perc) as u64);
 		assert_eq!(chan.context.holder_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis, expected_outbound_selected_chan_reserve);
@@ -9895,7 +9904,7 @@ mod tests {
 		// Create Node A's channel pointing to Node B's pubkey
 		let node_b_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
 		let config = UserConfig::default();
-		let mut node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+		let mut node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 
 		// Create Node B's channel by receiving Node A's open_channel message
 		// Make sure A's dust limit is as we expect.
@@ -9971,7 +9980,7 @@ mod tests {
 		let config = UserConfig::default();
 		let features = channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config);
 		let mut outbound_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(
-			&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &features, 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None
+			&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &features, 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger
 		).unwrap();
 		let inbound_chan = InboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(
 			&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_channel_type_features(&config),
@@ -10125,7 +10134,7 @@ mod tests {
 		let counterparty_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
 		let mut config = UserConfig::default();
 		config.channel_handshake_config.announced_channel = false;
-		let mut chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&Keys>::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&feeest), &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, counterparty_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10_000_000, 0, 42, &config, 0, 42, None).unwrap(); // Nothing uses their network key in this test
+		let mut chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&Keys>::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&feeest), &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, counterparty_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10_000_000, 0, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &logger).unwrap(); // Nothing uses their network key in this test
 		chan.context.holder_dust_limit_satoshis = 546;
 		chan.context.counterparty_selected_channel_reserve_satoshis = Some(0); // Filled in in accept_channel
 
@@ -10872,7 +10881,7 @@ mod tests {
 		let node_b_node_id = PublicKey::from_secret_key(&secp_ctx, &SecretKey::from_slice(&[42; 32]).unwrap());
 		let config = UserConfig::default();
 		let node_a_chan = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(&feeest, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider,
-			node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None).unwrap();
+			node_b_node_id, &channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger).unwrap();
 
 		let mut channel_type_features = ChannelTypeFeatures::only_static_remote_key();
 		channel_type_features.set_zero_conf_required();
@@ -10907,7 +10916,7 @@ mod tests {
 		let channel_a = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(
 			&fee_estimator, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id_b,
 			&channelmanager::provided_init_features(&UserConfig::default()), 10000000, 100000, 42,
-			&config, 0, 42, None
+			&config, 0, 42, None, &&logger
 		).unwrap();
 		assert!(!channel_a.context.channel_type.supports_anchors_zero_fee_htlc_tx());
 
@@ -10918,7 +10927,7 @@ mod tests {
 		let channel_a = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(
 			&fee_estimator, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id_b,
 			&channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42,
-			None
+			None, &&logger
 		).unwrap();
 
 		let open_channel_msg = channel_a.get_open_channel(ChainHash::using_genesis_block(network));
@@ -10956,7 +10965,7 @@ mod tests {
 		let channel_a = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(
 			&fee_estimator, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id_b,
 			&channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42,
-			None
+			None, &&logger
 		).unwrap();
 
 		// Set `channel_type` to `None` to force the implicit feature negotiation.
@@ -11003,7 +11012,7 @@ mod tests {
 		let channel_a = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(
 			&fee_estimator, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id_b,
 			&channelmanager::provided_init_features(&config), 10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42,
-			None
+			None, &&logger
 		).unwrap();
 
 		let mut open_channel_msg = channel_a.get_open_channel(ChainHash::using_genesis_block(network));
@@ -11022,7 +11031,7 @@ mod tests {
 		// LDK.
 		let mut channel_a = OutboundV1Channel::<&TestKeysInterface>::new(
 			&fee_estimator, &&keys_provider, &&keys_provider, node_id_b, &simple_anchors_init,
-			10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None
+			10000000, 100000, 42, &config, 0, 42, None, &&logger
 		).unwrap();
 
 		let open_channel_msg = channel_a.get_open_channel(ChainHash::using_genesis_block(network));
@@ -11072,7 +11081,8 @@ mod tests {
 			&config,
 			0,
 			42,
-			None
+			None,
+			&&logger
 		).unwrap();
 
 		let open_channel_msg = node_a_chan.get_open_channel(ChainHash::using_genesis_block(network));

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs

@@ -3283,7 +3283,7 @@ where
 			let config = if override_config.is_some() { override_config.as_ref().unwrap() } else { &self.default_configuration };
 			match OutboundV1Channel::new(&self.fee_estimator, &self.entropy_source, &self.signer_provider, their_network_key,
 				their_features, channel_value_satoshis, push_msat, user_channel_id, config,
-				self.best_block.read().unwrap().height, outbound_scid_alias, temporary_channel_id)
+				self.best_block.read().unwrap().height, outbound_scid_alias, temporary_channel_id, &self.logger)
 			{
 				Ok(res) => res,
 				Err(e) => {

lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ use crate::ln::features::{ChannelFeatures, ChannelTypeFeatures, NodeFeatures};
 use crate::ln::msgs;
 use crate::ln::msgs::{ChannelMessageHandler, RoutingMessageHandler, ErrorAction};
 use crate::util::test_channel_signer::TestChannelSigner;
-use crate::util::test_utils::{self, WatchtowerPersister};
+use crate::util::test_utils::{self, TestLogger, WatchtowerPersister};
 use crate::util::errors::APIError;
 use crate::util::ser::{Writeable, ReadableArgs};
 use crate::util::string::UntrustedString;
@@ -7233,11 +7233,12 @@ fn test_user_configurable_csv_delay() {
 	let node_cfgs = create_node_cfgs(2, &chanmon_cfgs);
 	let node_chanmgrs = create_node_chanmgrs(2, &node_cfgs, &user_cfgs);
 	let nodes = create_network(2, &node_cfgs, &node_chanmgrs);
+	let logger = TestLogger::new();
 
 	// We test config.our_to_self > BREAKDOWN_TIMEOUT is enforced in OutboundV1Channel::new()
 	if let Err(error) = OutboundV1Channel::new(&LowerBoundedFeeEstimator::new(&test_utils::TestFeeEstimator { sat_per_kw: Mutex::new(253) }),
 		&nodes[0].keys_manager, &nodes[0].keys_manager, nodes[1].node.get_our_node_id(), &nodes[1].node.init_features(), 1000000, 1000000, 0,
-		&low_our_to_self_config, 0, 42, None)
+		&low_our_to_self_config, 0, 42, None, &&logger)
 	{
 		match error {
 			APIError::APIMisuseError { err } => { assert!(regex::Regex::new(r"Configured with an unreasonable our_to_self_delay \(\d+\) putting user funds at risks").unwrap().is_match(err.as_str())); },