Skip to content

[Update] Object Storage Cancel; Object Storage Bucket Remove #569

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 30, 2021

Conversation

bbiggerr
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

description: |
Removes a single bucket.

Bucket objects must be removed prior to removing the bucket. While buckets containing objects _may_ be
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do bucket objects need to be removed first? I thought I saw some chatter somewhere in Slack that indicated you did not need to remove first. You should confirm.

Copy link

@bcmertz bcmertz Nov 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're correct @yoshizzle


Bucket objects must be removed prior to removing the bucket. While buckets containing objects _may_ be
deleted using the [s3cmd command-line tool](/docs/products/storage/object-storage/guides/s3cmd/#delete-a-bucket), such operations
can fail if the bucket contains too many objects. The recommended
Copy link

@bcmertz bcmertz Nov 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Bucket objects must be removed prior to removing the bucket" - This will no longer be true once bapi support is merged and the API force flag is deprecated.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update: after speaking to @bbiggerr the changes here only reflect https://bits.linode.com/LinodeAPI/apinext/pull/4001 and remove reference to the force flag (prior to it being removed). With this in mind ignore the above comment :)

@bcmertz
Copy link

bcmertz commented Nov 30, 2021

This is blocked until https://bits.linode.com/LinodeAPI/apinext/pull/4002 and it's needed bapi changes are merged

Nevermind, these changes only reflect asynchronously canceling ceph user, so aren't blocked by the above PR

@bbiggerr bbiggerr merged commit 787cc7f into linode:development Nov 30, 2021
LBGarber pushed a commit to LBGarber/linode-api-docs that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2022
…s-2022-04-29

Header + Footer Updates - April 29,2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants