You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ipv6: Get rid of RTNL for SIOCDELRT and RTM_DELROUTE.
Basically, removing an IPv6 route does not require RTNL because
the IPv6 routing tables are protected by per table lock.
inet6_rtm_delroute() calls nexthop_find_by_id() to check if the
nexthop specified by RTA_NH_ID exists. nexthop uses rbtree and
the top-down walk can be safely performed under RCU.
ip6_route_del() already relies on RCU and the table lock, but we
need to extend the RCU critical section a bit more to cover
__ip6_del_rt(). For example, nexthop_for_each_fib6_nh() and
inet6_rt_notify() needs RCU.
Let's call nexthop_find_by_id() and __ip6_del_rt() under RCU and
get rid of RTNL from inet6_rtm_delroute() and SIOCDELRT.
Even if the nexthop is removed after rcu_read_unlock() in
inet6_rtm_delroute(), __remove_nexthop_fib() cleans up the routes
tied to the nexthop, and ip6_route_del() returns -ESRCH. So the
request was at least valid as of nexthop_find_by_id(), and it's just
a matter of timing.
Note that we need to pass false to lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr().
The following patches also use the newroute bool.
Note also that fib6_get_table() does not require RCU because once
allocated fib6_table is not freed until netns dismantle. I will
post a follow-up series to convert such callers to RCU-lockless
version. [0]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/ #[0]
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
0 commit comments