You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[Clang][Sema] Correctly transform dependent operands of overloaded binary operator& (#97596)
Currently, `TreeTransform::TransformCXXOperatorCallExpr` calls
`TreeTransform::TransformAddressOfOperand` to transform the first
operand of a `CXXOperatorCallExpr` when its `OverloadOperatorKind` is
`OO_Amp` -- regardless of arity. This results in the first operand of
binary `operator&` being incorrectly transformed as if it was the
operand of the address of operator in cases such as the following:
```
struct A {
int x;
};
void operator&(A, A);
template<typename T>
struct B {
int f() {
return T::x & 1; // invalid reference to 'A::x' is not diagnosed because 'T::x' is incorrectly transformed as if it was the operand of unary operator&
}
};
template struct B<A>;
```
Prior to #92318 we would build a `CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr` for
`T::x` (as with most dependent qualified names that were not member
qualified names). Since `TreeTransform::TransformAddressOfOperand` only
differs from `TransformExpr` for `DependentScopeDeclRefExpr` and
`UnresolvedLookupExpr` operands, `T::x` was transformed "correctly". Now
that we build a `DependentScopeDeclRefExpr` for `T::x`, it is
incorrectly transformed as if it was the operand of the address of
operator and we fail to diagnose the invalid reference to a non-static
data member. This patch fixes the issue by only calling
`TreeTransform::TransformAddressOfOperand` for `CXXOperatorCallExpr`s
with a single operand. This fixes#97483.
0 commit comments