Skip to content

Commit 1eed469

Browse files
authored
[AArch64] Eliminate Common Subexpression of CSEL by Reassociation (#121350)
If we have a CSEL instruction that depends on the flags set by a (SUBS x c) instruction and the true and/or false expression is (add (add x y) -c), we can reassociate the latter expression to (add (SUBS x c) y) and save one instruction. Proof for the basic transformation: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/-337Pb We can extend this transformation for slightly different constants. For example, if we have (add (add x y) -(c-1)) and a the comparison x <u c, we can transform the comparison to x <=u c-1 to eliminate the comparison instruction, too. Similarly, we can transform (x == 0) to (x <u 1). Proofs for the transformations that alter the constants: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/3nVqgR Fixes #119606.
1 parent 32351b5 commit 1eed469

File tree

2 files changed

+894
-0
lines changed

2 files changed

+894
-0
lines changed

llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp

Lines changed: 121 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -24867,6 +24867,122 @@ static SDValue foldCSELOfCSEL(SDNode *Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
2486724867
return DAG.getNode(AArch64ISD::CSEL, DL, VT, L, R, CCValue, Cond);
2486824868
}
2486924869

24870+
// Reassociate the true/false expressions of a CSEL instruction to obtain a
24871+
// common subexpression with the comparison instruction. For example, change
24872+
// (CSEL (ADD (ADD x y) -c) f LO (SUBS x c)) to
24873+
// (CSEL (ADD (SUBS x c) y) f LO (SUBS x c)) such that (SUBS x c) is a common
24874+
// subexpression.
24875+
static SDValue reassociateCSELOperandsForCSE(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
24876+
SDValue SubsNode = N->getOperand(3);
24877+
if (SubsNode.getOpcode() != AArch64ISD::SUBS || !SubsNode.hasOneUse())
24878+
return SDValue();
24879+
auto *CmpOpConst = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(SubsNode.getOperand(1));
24880+
if (!CmpOpConst)
24881+
return SDValue();
24882+
24883+
SDValue CmpOpOther = SubsNode.getOperand(0);
24884+
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
24885+
24886+
// Get the operand that can be reassociated with the SUBS instruction.
24887+
auto GetReassociationOp = [&](SDValue Op, APInt ExpectedConst) {
24888+
if (Op.getOpcode() != ISD::ADD)
24889+
return SDValue();
24890+
if (Op.getOperand(0).getOpcode() != ISD::ADD ||
24891+
!Op.getOperand(0).hasOneUse())
24892+
return SDValue();
24893+
SDValue X = Op.getOperand(0).getOperand(0);
24894+
SDValue Y = Op.getOperand(0).getOperand(1);
24895+
if (X != CmpOpOther)
24896+
std::swap(X, Y);
24897+
if (X != CmpOpOther)
24898+
return SDValue();
24899+
auto *AddOpConst = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(1));
24900+
if (!AddOpConst || AddOpConst->getAPIntValue() != ExpectedConst)
24901+
return SDValue();
24902+
return Y;
24903+
};
24904+
24905+
// Try the reassociation using the given constant and condition code.
24906+
auto Fold = [&](APInt NewCmpConst, AArch64CC::CondCode NewCC) {
24907+
APInt ExpectedConst = -NewCmpConst;
24908+
SDValue TReassocOp = GetReassociationOp(N->getOperand(0), ExpectedConst);
24909+
SDValue FReassocOp = GetReassociationOp(N->getOperand(1), ExpectedConst);
24910+
if (!TReassocOp && !FReassocOp)
24911+
return SDValue();
24912+
24913+
SDValue NewCmp = DAG.getNode(AArch64ISD::SUBS, SDLoc(SubsNode),
24914+
DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT_CC), CmpOpOther,
24915+
DAG.getConstant(NewCmpConst, SDLoc(CmpOpConst),
24916+
CmpOpConst->getValueType(0)));
24917+
24918+
auto Reassociate = [&](SDValue ReassocOp, unsigned OpNum) {
24919+
if (!ReassocOp)
24920+
return N->getOperand(OpNum);
24921+
SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, SDLoc(N->getOperand(OpNum)), VT,
24922+
NewCmp.getValue(0), ReassocOp);
24923+
DAG.ReplaceAllUsesWith(N->getOperand(OpNum), Res);
24924+
return Res;
24925+
};
24926+
24927+
SDValue TValReassoc = Reassociate(TReassocOp, 0);
24928+
SDValue FValReassoc = Reassociate(FReassocOp, 1);
24929+
return DAG.getNode(AArch64ISD::CSEL, SDLoc(N), VT, TValReassoc, FValReassoc,
24930+
DAG.getConstant(NewCC, SDLoc(N->getOperand(2)), MVT_CC),
24931+
NewCmp.getValue(1));
24932+
};
24933+
24934+
auto CC = static_cast<AArch64CC::CondCode>(N->getConstantOperandVal(2));
24935+
24936+
// First, try to eliminate the compare instruction by searching for a
24937+
// subtraction with the same constant.
24938+
if (SDValue R = Fold(CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue(), CC))
24939+
return R;
24940+
24941+
if ((CC == AArch64CC::EQ || CC == AArch64CC::NE) && !CmpOpConst->isZero())
24942+
return SDValue();
24943+
24944+
// Next, search for a subtraction with a slightly different constant. By
24945+
// adjusting the condition code, we can still eliminate the compare
24946+
// instruction. Adjusting the constant is only valid if it does not result
24947+
// in signed/unsigned wrap for signed/unsigned comparisons, respectively.
24948+
// Since such comparisons are trivially true/false, we should not encounter
24949+
// them here but check for them nevertheless to be on the safe side.
24950+
auto CheckedFold = [&](bool Check, APInt NewCmpConst,
24951+
AArch64CC::CondCode NewCC) {
24952+
return Check ? Fold(NewCmpConst, NewCC) : SDValue();
24953+
};
24954+
switch (CC) {
24955+
case AArch64CC::EQ:
24956+
case AArch64CC::LS:
24957+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMaxValue(),
24958+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() + 1, AArch64CC::LO);
24959+
case AArch64CC::NE:
24960+
case AArch64CC::HI:
24961+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMaxValue(),
24962+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() + 1, AArch64CC::HS);
24963+
case AArch64CC::LO:
24964+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isZero(),
24965+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() - 1, AArch64CC::LS);
24966+
case AArch64CC::HS:
24967+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isZero(),
24968+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() - 1, AArch64CC::HI);
24969+
case AArch64CC::LT:
24970+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMinSignedValue(),
24971+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() - 1, AArch64CC::LE);
24972+
case AArch64CC::LE:
24973+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMaxSignedValue(),
24974+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() + 1, AArch64CC::LT);
24975+
case AArch64CC::GT:
24976+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMaxSignedValue(),
24977+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() + 1, AArch64CC::GE);
24978+
case AArch64CC::GE:
24979+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMinSignedValue(),
24980+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() - 1, AArch64CC::GT);
24981+
default:
24982+
return SDValue();
24983+
}
24984+
}
24985+
2487024986
// Optimize CSEL instructions
2487124987
static SDValue performCSELCombine(SDNode *N,
2487224988
TargetLowering::DAGCombinerInfo &DCI,
@@ -24878,6 +24994,11 @@ static SDValue performCSELCombine(SDNode *N,
2487824994
if (SDValue R = foldCSELOfCSEL(N, DAG))
2487924995
return R;
2488024996

24997+
// Try to reassociate the true/false expressions so that we can do CSE with
24998+
// a SUBS instruction used to perform the comparison.
24999+
if (SDValue R = reassociateCSELOperandsForCSE(N, DAG))
25000+
return R;
25001+
2488125002
// CSEL 0, cttz(X), eq(X, 0) -> AND cttz bitwidth-1
2488225003
// CSEL cttz(X), 0, ne(X, 0) -> AND cttz bitwidth-1
2488325004
if (SDValue Folded = foldCSELofCTTZ(N, DAG))

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)