[llvm] Fix typos in documentation

Author: kazutakahirata

llvm/docs/AliasAnalysis.rst

@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ Writing a new ``AliasAnalysis`` Implementation
 
 Writing a new alias analysis implementation for LLVM is quite straight-forward.
 There are already several implementations that you can use for examples, and the
-following information should help fill in any details.  For a examples, take a
+following information should help fill in any details.  For examples, take a
 look at the `various alias analysis implementations`_ included with LLVM.
 
 Different Pass styles

llvm/docs/ConvergentOperations.rst

@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ those in the caller.
    only if both threads entered the function by executing converged
    dynamic instances of the call-site.
 
-This intrinsic can occur at most once in a function, and only in the the entry
+This intrinsic can occur at most once in a function, and only in the entry
 block of the function. If this intrinsic occurs in a basic block, then it must
 precede any other convergent operation in the same basic block.
 

llvm/docs/JITLink.rst

@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ finally transferring linked memory to the executing process.
 
       Calls the ``JITLinkContext``'s ``JITLinkMemoryManager`` to allocate both
       working and target memory for the graph. As part of this process the
-      ``JITLinkMemoryManager`` will update the the addresses of all nodes
+      ``JITLinkMemoryManager`` will update the addresses of all nodes
       defined in the graph to their assigned target address.
 
       Note: This step only updates the addresses of nodes defined in this graph.

llvm/docs/LangRef.rst

@@ -1515,7 +1515,7 @@ Currently, only the following parameter attributes are defined:
     over-alignment specification through language attributes).
 
 ``allocalign``
-    The function parameter marked with this attribute is is the alignment in bytes of the
+    The function parameter marked with this attribute is the alignment in bytes of the
     newly allocated block returned by this function. The returned value must either have
     the specified alignment or be the null pointer. The return value MAY be more aligned
     than the requested alignment, but not less aligned.  Invalid (e.g. non-power-of-2)
@@ -22798,7 +22798,7 @@ Semantics:
 
 The '``llvm.vp.fcmp``' compares its first two operands according to the
 condition code given as the third operand. The operands are compared element by
-element on each enabled lane, where the the semantics of the comparison are
+element on each enabled lane, where the semantics of the comparison are
 defined :ref:`according to the condition code <fcmp_md_cc_sem>`. Masked-off
 lanes are ``poison``.
 
@@ -22856,7 +22856,7 @@ Semantics:
 
 The '``llvm.vp.icmp``' compares its first two operands according to the
 condition code given as the third operand. The operands are compared element by
-element on each enabled lane, where the the semantics of the comparison are
+element on each enabled lane, where the semantics of the comparison are
 defined :ref:`according to the condition code <icmp_md_cc_sem>`. Masked-off
 lanes are ``poison``.
 

llvm/docs/NVPTXUsage.rst

@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ optimization pipeline before dead-code elimination.
 The NVPTX TargetMachine knows how to schedule ``NVVMReflect`` at the beginning
 of your pass manager; just use the following code when setting up your pass
 manager and the PassBuilder will use ``registerPassBuilderCallbacks`` to let
-NVPTXTargetMachine::registerPassBuilderCallbacks add the the pass to the
+NVPTXTargetMachine::registerPassBuilderCallbacks add the pass to the
 pass manager:
 
 .. code-block:: c++

llvm/docs/TableGen/ProgRef.rst

@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ The argument values can be specified in two forms:
   argument with name ``a`` and ``a1`` will be assigned to the argument with
   name ``b``.
 
-Required arguments can alse be specified as named argument.
+Required arguments can also be specified as named argument.
 
 Note that the argument can only be specified once regardless of the way (named
 or positional) to specify and positional arguments should be put before named