Skip to content

Commit 43f2da4

Browse files
committed
[AArch64] Eliminate Common Subexpression of CSEL by Reassociation
If we have a CSEL instruction that depends on the flags set by a (SUBS x c) instruction and the true and/or false expression is (add (add x y) -c), we can reassociate the latter expression to (add (SUBS x c) y) and save one instruction. Proof for the basic transformation: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/-337Pb We can extend this transformation for slightly different constants. For example, if we have (add (add x y) -(c-1)) and a the comparison x <u c, we can transform the comparison to x <=u c-1 to eliminate the comparison instruction, too. Similarly, we can transform (x == 0) to (x <u 1). Proofs for the transformations that alter the constants: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/3nVqgR Fixes #119606.
1 parent 6417c98 commit 43f2da4

File tree

2 files changed

+186
-91
lines changed

2 files changed

+186
-91
lines changed

llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp

Lines changed: 121 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -24838,6 +24838,122 @@ static SDValue foldCSELOfCSEL(SDNode *Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
2483824838
return DAG.getNode(AArch64ISD::CSEL, DL, VT, L, R, CCValue, Cond);
2483924839
}
2484024840

24841+
// Reassociate the true/false expressions of a CSEL instruction to obtain a
24842+
// common subexpression with the comparison instruction. For example, change
24843+
// (CSEL (ADD (ADD x y) -c) f LO (SUBS x c)) to
24844+
// (CSEL (ADD (SUBS x c) y) f LO (SUBS x c)) such that (SUBS x c) is a common
24845+
// subexpression.
24846+
static SDValue reassociateCSELOperandsForCSE(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
24847+
SDValue SubsNode = N->getOperand(3);
24848+
if (SubsNode.getOpcode() != AArch64ISD::SUBS || !SubsNode.hasOneUse())
24849+
return SDValue();
24850+
auto *CmpOpConst = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(SubsNode.getOperand(1));
24851+
if (!CmpOpConst)
24852+
return SDValue();
24853+
24854+
SDValue CmpOpOther = SubsNode.getOperand(0);
24855+
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
24856+
24857+
// Get the operand that can be reassociated with the SUBS instruction.
24858+
auto GetReassociationOp = [&](SDValue Op, APInt ExpectedConst) {
24859+
if (Op.getOpcode() != ISD::ADD)
24860+
return SDValue();
24861+
if (Op.getOperand(0).getOpcode() != ISD::ADD ||
24862+
!Op.getOperand(0).hasOneUse())
24863+
return SDValue();
24864+
SDValue X = Op.getOperand(0).getOperand(0);
24865+
SDValue Y = Op.getOperand(0).getOperand(1);
24866+
if (X != CmpOpOther)
24867+
std::swap(X, Y);
24868+
if (X != CmpOpOther)
24869+
return SDValue();
24870+
auto *AddOpConst = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Op.getOperand(1));
24871+
if (!AddOpConst || AddOpConst->getAPIntValue() != ExpectedConst)
24872+
return SDValue();
24873+
return Y;
24874+
};
24875+
24876+
// Try the reassociation using the given constant and condition code.
24877+
auto Fold = [&](APInt NewCmpConst, AArch64CC::CondCode NewCC) {
24878+
APInt ExpectedConst = -NewCmpConst;
24879+
SDValue TReassocOp = GetReassociationOp(N->getOperand(0), ExpectedConst);
24880+
SDValue FReassocOp = GetReassociationOp(N->getOperand(1), ExpectedConst);
24881+
if (!TReassocOp && !FReassocOp)
24882+
return SDValue();
24883+
24884+
SDValue NewCmp = DAG.getNode(AArch64ISD::SUBS, SDLoc(SubsNode),
24885+
DAG.getVTList(VT, MVT_CC), CmpOpOther,
24886+
DAG.getConstant(NewCmpConst, SDLoc(CmpOpConst),
24887+
CmpOpConst->getValueType(0)));
24888+
24889+
auto Reassociate = [&](SDValue ReassocOp, unsigned OpNum) {
24890+
if (!ReassocOp)
24891+
return N->getOperand(OpNum);
24892+
SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, SDLoc(N->getOperand(OpNum)), VT,
24893+
NewCmp.getValue(0), ReassocOp);
24894+
DAG.ReplaceAllUsesWith(N->getOperand(OpNum), Res);
24895+
return Res;
24896+
};
24897+
24898+
SDValue TValReassoc = Reassociate(TReassocOp, 0);
24899+
SDValue FValReassoc = Reassociate(FReassocOp, 1);
24900+
return DAG.getNode(AArch64ISD::CSEL, SDLoc(N), VT, TValReassoc, FValReassoc,
24901+
DAG.getConstant(NewCC, SDLoc(N->getOperand(2)), MVT_CC),
24902+
NewCmp.getValue(1));
24903+
};
24904+
24905+
auto CC = static_cast<AArch64CC::CondCode>(N->getConstantOperandVal(2));
24906+
24907+
// First, try to eliminate the compare instruction by searching for a
24908+
// subtraction with the same constant.
24909+
if (SDValue R = Fold(CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue(), CC))
24910+
return R;
24911+
24912+
if ((CC == AArch64CC::EQ || CC == AArch64CC::NE) && !CmpOpConst->isZero())
24913+
return SDValue();
24914+
24915+
// Next, search for a subtraction with a slightly different constant. By
24916+
// adjusting the condition code, we can still eliminate the compare
24917+
// instruction. Adjusting the constant is only valid if it does not result
24918+
// in signed/unsigned wrap for signed/unsigned comparisons, respectively.
24919+
// Since such comparisons are trivially true/false, we should not encounter
24920+
// them here but check for them nevertheless to be on the safe side.
24921+
auto CheckedFold = [&](bool Check, APInt NewCmpConst,
24922+
AArch64CC::CondCode NewCC) {
24923+
return Check ? Fold(NewCmpConst, NewCC) : SDValue();
24924+
};
24925+
switch (CC) {
24926+
case AArch64CC::EQ:
24927+
case AArch64CC::LS:
24928+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMaxValue(),
24929+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() + 1, AArch64CC::LO);
24930+
case AArch64CC::NE:
24931+
case AArch64CC::HI:
24932+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMaxValue(),
24933+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() + 1, AArch64CC::HS);
24934+
case AArch64CC::LO:
24935+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isZero(),
24936+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() - 1, AArch64CC::LS);
24937+
case AArch64CC::HS:
24938+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isZero(),
24939+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() - 1, AArch64CC::HI);
24940+
case AArch64CC::LT:
24941+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMinSignedValue(),
24942+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() - 1, AArch64CC::LE);
24943+
case AArch64CC::LE:
24944+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMaxSignedValue(),
24945+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() + 1, AArch64CC::LT);
24946+
case AArch64CC::GT:
24947+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMaxSignedValue(),
24948+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() + 1, AArch64CC::GE);
24949+
case AArch64CC::GE:
24950+
return CheckedFold(!CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue().isMinSignedValue(),
24951+
CmpOpConst->getAPIntValue() - 1, AArch64CC::GT);
24952+
default:
24953+
return SDValue();
24954+
}
24955+
}
24956+
2484124957
// Optimize CSEL instructions
2484224958
static SDValue performCSELCombine(SDNode *N,
2484324959
TargetLowering::DAGCombinerInfo &DCI,
@@ -24849,6 +24965,11 @@ static SDValue performCSELCombine(SDNode *N,
2484924965
if (SDValue R = foldCSELOfCSEL(N, DAG))
2485024966
return R;
2485124967

24968+
// Try to reassociate the true/false expressions so that we can do CSE with
24969+
// a SUBS instruction used to perform the comparison.
24970+
if (SDValue R = reassociateCSELOperandsForCSE(N, DAG))
24971+
return R;
24972+
2485224973
// CSEL 0, cttz(X), eq(X, 0) -> AND cttz bitwidth-1
2485324974
// CSEL cttz(X), 0, ne(X, 0) -> AND cttz bitwidth-1
2485424975
if (SDValue Folded = foldCSELofCTTZ(N, DAG))

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)